Subjective Wellbeing in Colombia : Some Insights on Vulnerability, Job Security, and Relative Incomes
| dc.creator | Krauss, Alexander | |
| dc.creator | Graham, Carol | |
| dc.date | 2014-02-04T20:08:23Z | |
| dc.date | 2014-02-04T20:08:23Z | |
| dc.date | 2013-10 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-07-01T00:57:35Z | |
| dc.description | A burgeoning literature explores the extent to which consumption or income inadequately reflect people's subjective wellbeing, just as GDP at times can provide an incomplete and misleading picture of national wellbeing. Scholars are increasingly using data on subjective wellbeing to complement traditional welfare indicators and to enrich our understanding of wellbeing and quality of life. The paper builds on the present research but it analyzes a much broader, more interdisciplinary, and more policy-relevant range of potential determinants simultaneously than currently existing in the literature on subjective wellbeing. It first analyzes the relative importance of a wide range of characteristics and conditions at the individual, household, regional and macro levels on levels of subjective wellbeing in Colombia in 2010/11; and second, assesses the marginal effects of a number of factors on perceived changes in levels of subjective wellbeing over time for the same respondents from 2008/09 to 2010/11. Findings show that increasing the quality of life of Colombians is largely conditional on minimizing risks and vulnerabilities: reducing the rate and duration of unemployment; improving the delivery of public health services; increasing the share of people with health and pension plans; enhancing safety and security in communities; and reducing levels of discrimination. It finds that job loss has particularly strong effects on levels of satisfaction that are larger than those for increased income, while also controlling for a decrease in income that is often related to being unemployed, suggesting that the human welfare (non-pecuniary) costs of unemployment are driving the strong effects. Moreover, any job, even a low-quality job, is overall better for one's subjective wellbeing than being unemployed. Finally, policy aimed at improving people's subjective wellbeing will likely have the greatest impact if focused on mitigating vulnerabilities and negative shocks that people face. | |
| dc.format | application/pdf | |
| dc.format | text/plain | |
| dc.identifier | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2013/10/18425196/subjective-wellbeing-colombia-some-insights-vulnerability-job-security-relative-incomes | |
| dc.identifier | https://hdl.handle.net/10986/16887 | |
| dc.identifier | https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-6672 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/413518 | |
| dc.language | English | |
| dc.language | en_US | |
| dc.publisher | World Bank, Washington, DC | |
| dc.relation | Policy Research Working Paper;No. 6672 | |
| dc.rights | CC BY 3.0 IGO | |
| dc.rights | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ | |
| dc.rights | World Bank | |
| dc.subject | ACCOUNTABILITY | |
| dc.subject | AGE GROUP | |
| dc.subject | AGE GROUPS | |
| dc.subject | ANXIETY | |
| dc.subject | ARMED CONFLICT | |
| dc.subject | BASIC NEEDS | |
| dc.subject | CASH TRANSFERS | |
| dc.subject | CITIZENS | |
| dc.subject | CRIME | |
| dc.subject | CROSS-SECTIONAL DATA | |
| dc.subject | DEMOCRACY | |
| dc.subject | DEMOGRAPHIC FACTORS | |
| dc.subject | DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS | |
| dc.subject | DEVELOPING COUNTRIES | |
| dc.subject | DEVELOPMENT POLICY | |
| dc.subject | DISABILITY | |
| dc.subject | DISCRIMINATION | |
| dc.subject | DIVORCE | |
| dc.subject | ECONOMIC FACTORS | |
| dc.subject | ECONOMIC GROWTH | |
| dc.subject | ECONOMIC INSECURITIES | |
| dc.subject | ECONOMIC INSECURITY | |
| dc.subject | ECONOMIC MOBILITY | |
| dc.subject | ECONOMIC SHOCKS | |
| dc.subject | ECONOMIC STATUS | |
| dc.subject | EMPLOYABILITY | |
| dc.subject | EMPLOYMENT STATUS | |
| dc.subject | FAMILY RELATIONS | |
| dc.subject | FARMERS | |
| dc.subject | FINDING EMPLOYMENT | |
| dc.subject | GDP | |
| dc.subject | GENDER DIFFERENCES | |
| dc.subject | HEALTH INSURANCE | |
| dc.subject | HEALTH SERVICES | |
| dc.subject | HOUSEHOLD INCOME | |
| dc.subject | HOUSEHOLD SURVEYS | |
| dc.subject | HOUSEHOLD WELFARE | |
| dc.subject | HUMAN WELFARE | |
| dc.subject | ILLNESS | |
| dc.subject | IMPORTANCE OF EDUCATION | |
| dc.subject | INCOME DISTRIBUTION | |
| dc.subject | INSURANCE SCHEMES | |
| dc.subject | JOB LOSS | |
| dc.subject | JOB SEARCH | |
| dc.subject | JOB SECURITY | |
| dc.subject | LABOR MARKET | |
| dc.subject | LABORERS | |
| dc.subject | LEVEL OF EDUCATION | |
| dc.subject | LEVELS OF EDUCATION | |
| dc.subject | MEASURES OF POVERTY | |
| dc.subject | MEDICAL SERVICES | |
| dc.subject | MIGRANT | |
| dc.subject | MIGRANTS | |
| dc.subject | MIGRATION | |
| dc.subject | MUTUAL RESPECT | |
| dc.subject | NATIONAL GOVERNMENT | |
| dc.subject | NATIONAL POVERTY | |
| dc.subject | NATIONAL POVERTY LINE | |
| dc.subject | NUMBER OF CHILDREN | |
| dc.subject | OCCUPATION | |
| dc.subject | OCCUPATIONS | |
| dc.subject | PEACE | |
| dc.subject | PERSONALITY | |
| dc.subject | PHYSICAL HEALTH | |
| dc.subject | POLICY DISCUSSIONS | |
| dc.subject | POLICY IMPLICATIONS | |
| dc.subject | POLICY MAKERS | |
| dc.subject | POLICY RESEARCH | |
| dc.subject | POLICY RESEARCH WORKING PAPER | |
| dc.subject | POLITICAL PARTICIPATION | |
| dc.subject | POOR | |
| dc.subject | POVERTY REDUCTION | |
| dc.subject | PRIMARY EDUCATION | |
| dc.subject | PRIMARY SAMPLING UNITS | |
| dc.subject | PRIVATE SECTOR | |
| dc.subject | PROBIT REGRESSION | |
| dc.subject | PROBIT REGRESSIONS | |
| dc.subject | PROGRAMS | |
| dc.subject | PROGRESS | |
| dc.subject | PROPENSITY SCORE MATCHING | |
| dc.subject | PUBLIC EDUCATION | |
| dc.subject | PUBLIC HEALTH | |
| dc.subject | PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICES | |
| dc.subject | PUBLIC OPINION | |
| dc.subject | PUBLIC SECTOR WORKERS | |
| dc.subject | QUALITY OF LIFE | |
| dc.subject | REDUCING POVERTY | |
| dc.subject | REMITTANCES | |
| dc.subject | REMOTE AREAS | |
| dc.subject | RURAL | |
| dc.subject | RURAL AREAS | |
| dc.subject | SAFETY NET | |
| dc.subject | SAFETY NETS | |
| dc.subject | SANITATION | |
| dc.subject | SELF-ESTEEM | |
| dc.subject | SERVICE DELIVERY | |
| dc.subject | SEX | |
| dc.subject | SKILLS DEVELOPMENT | |
| dc.subject | SOCIAL FACTORS | |
| dc.subject | SOCIAL PROGRESS | |
| dc.subject | SOCIAL TENSIONS | |
| dc.subject | SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION | |
| dc.subject | STABLE JOBS | |
| dc.subject | TRAUMA | |
| dc.subject | UNEMPLOYED | |
| dc.subject | UNEMPLOYMENT | |
| dc.subject | UNIVERSAL ACCESS | |
| dc.subject | URBAN AREAS | |
| dc.subject | VIOLENCE | |
| dc.subject | VULNERABILITY | |
| dc.subject | WELFARE INDICATORS | |
| dc.subject | WELL BEING | |
| dc.subject | WELL-BEING | |
| dc.subject | WELLBEING | |
| dc.subject | WORK ENVIRONMENT | |
| dc.subject | WORKER | |
| dc.subject | WORKERS | |
| dc.subject | life satisfaction | |
| dc.title | Subjective Wellbeing in Colombia : Some Insights on Vulnerability, Job Security, and Relative Incomes |
