A correlation structure for the analysis of Gaussian and non-Gaussian responses in crossover experimental designs with repeated measures
| dc.audience | Investigador | |
| dc.coverage | Cundinamarca | |
| dc.coverage | Bogotá | |
| dc.coverage | C.I Tibaitatá | |
| dc.coverage | Colombia | |
| dc.creator | Martinez Niño, Carlos Alberto | |
| dc.creator | Cruz, N. A. | |
| dc.creator | Melo, O. O. | |
| dc.date | 2024-05-20T16:17:05Z | |
| dc.date | 2024-05-20T16:17:05Z | |
| dc.date | 2022 | |
| dc.date | 2022 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-06-27T04:40:50Z | |
| dc.description | In this paper, we propose a family of correlation structures for crossover designs with repeated measures for both, Gaussian and non-Gaussian responses using generalized estimating equations (GEE). The structure considers two matrices: one that models between-period correlation and another one that models within-period correlation. The overall correlation matrix, which is used to build the GEE, corresponds to the Kronecker between these matrices. A procedure to estimate the parameters of the correlation matrix is proposed, its statistical properties are studied and a comparison with standard models using a single correlation matrix is carried out. A simulation study showed a superior performance of the proposed structure in terms of the quasi-likelihood criterion, efficiency, and the capacity to explain complex correlation phenomena patterns in longitudinal data from crossover designs. | |
| dc.description | Facultad de Enfermería, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia | |
| dc.format | application/pdf | |
| dc.format | application/pdf | |
| dc.identifier | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00362-022-01391-z | |
| dc.identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12324/39372 | |
| dc.identifier | https://doi.org/10.1007/s00362-022-01391-z | |
| dc.identifier | reponame:Biblioteca Digital Agropecuaria de Colombia | |
| dc.identifier | instname:Corporación colombiana de investigación agropecuaria AGROSAVIA | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/35183 | |
| dc.language | eng | |
| dc.publisher | Springer Nature | |
| dc.relation | CornellUniversity | |
| dc.relation | 65 | |
| dc.relation | 1 | |
| dc.relation | 263 | |
| dc.relation | 290 | |
| dc.relation | Basu S, Santra S (2010) A joint model for incomplete data in crossover trials. J Stat Plan Inference 140(10):2839–2845 | |
| dc.relation | Biabani M, Farrell M, Zoghi M, Egan G, Jaberzadeh S (2018) Crossover design in transcranial direct current stimulation studies on motor learning: potential pitfalls and difficulties in interpretation of findings. Rev Neurosci 29(4):463–473 | |
| dc.relation | Boik RJ (1991) Scheffés mixed model for multivariate repeated measures: a relative efficiency evaluation. Commun Stat 20(4):1233–1255 | |
| dc.relation | Carey VJ (2019) Gee: Generalized Estimation Equation Solver. R package version 4.13-20. https://CRAN. R-project.org/package=gee | |
| dc.relation | Cordeiro GM (2004) On Pearson’s residuals in generalized linear models. Stat Probab Lett 66(3):213–219 | |
| dc.relation | Cordeiro GM, McCullagh P (1991) Bias correction in generalized linear models. J R Stat Soc Ser B (Methodological) 53(3):629–643 | |
| dc.relation | Cox DR, Snell EJ (1968) A general definition of residuals. J R Stat Soc Ser B 30(2):248–265 | |
| dc.relation | Curtin F (2017) Meta-analysis combining parallel and crossover trials using generalised estimating equation method. Res Synth Methods 8(3):312–320 | |
| dc.relation | Davis CS (2002) Statistical methods for the analysis of repeated measurements. Springer, San Diego | |
| dc.relation | Diaz FJ, Berg MJ, Krebill R, Welty T, Gidal BE, Alloway R, Privitera M (2013) Random-effects linear modeling and sample size tables for two special crossover designs of average bioequivalence studies: the four-period, two-sequence, two-formulation and six-period, three-sequence, three-formulation designs. Clin Pharmacokinet 52(12):1033–1043 | |
| dc.relation | Dubois A, Lavielle M, Gsteiger S, Pigeolet E, Mentré F (2011) Model-based analyses of bioequivalence crossover trials using the stochastic approximation expectation maximisation algorithm. Stat Med 30(21):2582–2600 | |
| dc.relation | Forbes AB, Akram M, Pilcher D, Cooper J, Bellomo R (2015) Cluster randomised crossover trials with binary data and unbalanced cluster sizes: application to studies of near-universal interventions in intensive care. Clin Trials 12(1):34–44 | |
| dc.relation | Grayling MJ, Mander AP, Wason JM (2018) Blinded and unblinded sample size reestimation in crossover trials balanced for period. Biometr J 60(5):917–933 | |
| dc.relation | Hao C, von Rosen D, von Rosen T (2015) Explicit influence analysis in two-treatment balanced crossover models. Math Methods Stat 24(1):16–36 | |
| dc.relation | Hardin JW, Hilbe J (2003) Generalized estimating equations. Chapman & Hall, Boca Raton | |
| dc.relation | Harville DA (1997) Matrix algebra from a statistician’s perspective, vol 1. Springer, New York | |
| dc.relation | Hin L-Y,Wang Y-G (2009)Working-correlation-structure identification in generalized estimating equations. Stat Med 28(4):642–658 | |
| dc.relation | Hinkelmann K, Kempthorne O (2005) Design and analysis of experiments. Wiley series in probability and mathematical statistics. Applied probability and statistics. Wiley, New York, p 2 | |
| dc.relation | Jaime GO (2019) Uso de Un Residuo de Papel Como Suplemento Para Vacas Lecheras. Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Sede Bogota, Tesis de maestría | |
| dc.relation | Jankar J, Mandal A (2021) Optimal crossover designs for generalized linear models: an application to work environment experiment. Stat Appl 19(1):319–336 | |
| dc.relation | Jankar J, Mandal A, Yang J (2020) Optimal crossover designs for generalized linear models. J Stat Theory Pract 14(2):1–27 | |
| dc.relation | Jones B, Kenward MG (2015) Design and analysis of cross-over trials, 3rd edn. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton | |
| dc.relation | Josephy H, Vansteelandt S, Vanderhasselt M-A, Loeys T (2015) Within-subject mediation analysis in ab/ba crossover designs. Int J Biostat 11(1):1–22 | |
| dc.relation | Kitchenham B, Madeyski L, Curtin F (2018) Corrections to effect size variances for continuous outcomes of cross-over clinical trials. Stat Med 37(2):320–323 | |
| dc.relation | Krzy´sko M, Skorzybut M (2009) Discriminant analysis of multivariate repeated measures data with a Kronecker product structured covariance matrices. Stat Papers 50(4):817–835 | |
| dc.relation | Lancaster H (1965) The Helmert matrices. Am Math Mntly 72(1):4–12 | |
| dc.relation | Leorato S, Mezzetti M (2016) Spatial panel data model with error dependence: a Bayesian separable covariance approach. Bayesian Anal 11(4):1035–1069 | |
| dc.relation | Li F, Forbes AB, Turner EL, Preisser JS (2018) Power and sample size requirements for gee analyses of cluster randomized crossover trials. Stat Med 1:1 | |
| dc.relation | Li F, Forbes AB, Turner EL, Preisser JS (2019) Power and sample size requirements for gee analyses of cluster randomized crossover trials. Stat Med 38(4):636–649 | |
| dc.relation | Liang K-Y, Zeger SL (1986) Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika 73(1):13–22 | |
| dc.relation | Liu F, Li Q (2016) A Bayesian model for joint analysis of multivariate repeated measures and time to event data in crossover trials. Stat Methods Med Res 25(5):2180–2192 | |
| dc.relation | Lui K-J (2015) Test equality between three treatments under an incomplete block crossover design. J Biopharm Stat 25(4):795–811 | |
| dc.relation | Madeyski L, Kitchenham B (2018) Effect sizes and their variance for ab/ba crossover design studies. Empirical Softw Eng 23(4):1982–2017 | |
| dc.relation | McDaniel LS, Henderson NC, Rathouz PJ (2013) Fast pure R implementation of GEE: application of the Matrix package. R J 5:181–187 | |
| dc.relation | Oh HS, Ko S-G, Oh M-S (2003) A Bayesian approach to assessing population bioequivalence in a 2 2 2 crossover design. J Appl Stat 30(8):881–891 | |
| dc.relation | Pan W (2001) Akaike’s information criterion in generalized estimating equations. Biometrics 57:120–125 | |
| dc.relation | Patterson HD (1951) Change-over trials. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological) 13, 256–271 | |
| dc.relation | Pitchforth J, Nelson-White E, van den Helder M, Oosting W (2020) The work environment pilot: an experiment to determine the optimal office design for a technology company. PLoS ONE 15(5):0232943 | |
| dc.relation | R Core Team: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria (2022). R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project. org/ | |
| dc.relation | Ratkowsky D, Alldredge R, Evans MA (1992) Cross-over experiments. Statistics A Series of Textbooks and Monographs, Washington | |
| dc.relation | Rosenkranz GK (2015) Analysis of cross-over studies with missing data. Stat Methods Med Res 24(4):420– 433 | |
| dc.relation | Roy A, Khattree R (2005) On implementation of a test for Kronecker product covariance structure for multivariate repeated measures data. Stat Methodol 2(4):297–306 | |
| dc.relation | Shkedy Z, Molenberghs G, Craenendonck HV, Steckler T, Bijnens L (2005) A hierarchical binomial-Poisson model for the analysis of a crossover design for correlated binary data when the number of trials is dose-dependent. J Biopharm Stat 15(2):225–239 | |
| dc.relation | Srivastava MS, von Rosen T, Von Rosen D (2008) Models with a Kronecker product covariance structure: estimation and testing. Math Methods Stat 17(4):357–370 | |
| dc.relation | Vegas S, Apa C, Juristo N (2016) Crossover designs in software engineering experiments: benefits and perils. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 42(2):120–135 | |
| dc.relation | Wang X, Chinchilli VM (2021) Analysis of crossover designs with nonignorable dropout. Stat Med 40(1):64–84 | |
| dc.relation | Zhang H, Yu Q, Feng C, Gunzler D, Wu P, Tu X (2012) A new look at the difference between the gee and the glmm when modeling longitudinal count responses. J Appl Stat 39(9):2067–2079 | |
| dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International | |
| dc.rights | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ | |
| dc.source | Statistical Papers (2022) 65:263–290 | |
| dc.subject | Carry-over effect | |
| dc.subject | Cross-over design | |
| dc.subject | Generalized estimating equations | |
| dc.subject | Kronecker correlation | |
| dc.subject | Overdispersion count data | |
| dc.subject | Ecuaciones | |
| dc.subject | Dispersión | |
| dc.subject | Métodos estadísticos | |
| dc.subject | Ganadería y especies menores | |
| dc.subject | http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8bc08746 | |
| dc.subject | http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2333 | |
| dc.subject | http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7377 | |
| dc.thumbnail | https://repository.agrosavia.co/bitstreams/80961e96-90a2-4b5b-b792-4e12e5162022/download | |
| dc.title | A correlation structure for the analysis of Gaussian and non-Gaussian responses in crossover experimental designs with repeated measures | |
| dc.type | Artículo científico |
