Second-Best Analysis of European Energy Policy: Is One Bird in the Hand Worth Two in the Bush?

dc.creatorHübler, Michael
dc.creatorSchenker, Oliver
dc.creatorFischer, Carolyn
dc.date2017-04-01T13:45:07Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-09T10:08:09Z
dc.descriptionThis paper studies policy instruments that correct insufficient learning-by-doing (LbD) and research and development (R&D) of renewable electricity technologies and insufficient investments in energy efficiency (EE) in the presence of carbon pricing. The theoretical model analysis shows how to re-adjust the first-best in second-best situations, in which one of the policy instruments is restricted. Calibrated to the European power sector, the first-best choice of all instruments reduces the climate policy cost by one third. Feed-in tariffs turn out to be good substitutes for LbD, but not for R&D or EE subsidies.
dc.identifierdoi:10.22004/ag.econ.230918
dc.identifierhttps://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/230918/files/NDL2015-106.pdf
dc.identifierhttp://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/230918
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/615802
dc.languageeng
dc.publisher
dc.sourcehttp://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/230918
dc.titleSecond-Best Analysis of European Energy Policy: Is One Bird in the Hand Worth Two in the Bush?
dc.typeText

Archivos