Greenhouse abatement policy: insights from the G-cubed multi-country model

dc.creatorMcKibbin, Warwick J.
dc.date2017-04-01T19:26:24Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-09T05:49:07Z
dc.descriptionThe third meeting of the Conference of the Parties of the Framework Convention on Climate Change held in Japan last December was a lost opportunity to set a realistic policy framework for addressing climate change in the coming decades. A number of countries proposed targets for greenhouse emissions, to be reached by a target date. The outcome was a range of different targets for each country. Analysis with the G‐cubed multi‐country model suggests that fixed targets are a costly way to address climate change. The extent of potential cost suggests the agreement will eventually fail. A better way to address climate change is to focus on uniformity in policy instruments that deliver differentiated outcomes rather than focus on differentiated policy settings.
dc.identifierdoi:10.22004/ag.econ.117224
dc.identifierhttps://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/117224/files/1467-8489.00039.pdf
dc.identifierhttp://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/117224
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/568753
dc.languageeng
dc.publisher
dc.sourcehttp://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/117224
dc.titleGreenhouse abatement policy: insights from the G-cubed multi-country model
dc.typeText

Archivos