Does microfinance reduce rural poverty? Evidence based on household panel data from Northern Ethiopia

dc.creatorBerhane, Guush
dc.creatorGardebroek, Cornelis
dc.date2011-01
dc.date2024-10-01T14:00:38Z
dc.date2024-10-01T14:00:38Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-27T15:16:34Z
dc.descriptionEvidence on the long‐term impacts of microfinance credit is scarce. We use a unique four‐round panel dataset on farm households in northern Ethiopia that had access to microfinance, observed on two key poverty indicators: household consumption and housing improvements. Fixed‐effects and random trend models are used to reduce potential selection biases due to time‐invariant unobserved heterogeneity and individual trends therein. Results show that borrowing indeed causally increased consumption and housing improvements. A flexible specification that takes into account repeated borrowings also suggests that borrowing has cumulative long‐term effects on these outcomes, implying that short‐term impact estimates may underestimate credit effects.
dc.identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/154287
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/99648
dc.languageen
dc.publisherWiley
dc.rightsLimited Access
dc.sourceBerhane, Guush; Gardebroek, Cornelis. 2011. Does microfinance reduce rural poverty? Evidence based on household panel data from Northern Ethiopia. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 93(1): 43-55. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aaq126
dc.subjectrural poverty
dc.subjectmicrofinance
dc.subjectdata
dc.subjectimpact
dc.subjectmodels
dc.titleDoes microfinance reduce rural poverty? Evidence based on household panel data from Northern Ethiopia
dc.typeJournal Article

Archivos