Can survey design reduce anchoring bias in recall data? Evidence from smallholder farmers in Malawi

dc.creatorGodlonton, Susan
dc.creatorHernandez, Manuel A.
dc.creatorPaz, Cynthia
dc.date2024-12-31
dc.date2024-12-09T21:11:11Z
dc.date2024-12-09T21:11:11Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-27T15:22:13Z
dc.descriptionRecall biases in retrospective self-reported survey data have important implications for empirical research. We leverage the survey design literature and test three strategies to attenuate mental anchoring in retrospective data collection: question ordering, retrieval cues and aggregate (community) anchoring. We focus on maize production and happiness reports among smallholder farmers in Malawi. Asking for retrospective before concurrent data on average reduces recall bias (i.e. the deviation of the recalled versus the concurrent outcome reported in the previous period) by 34 per cent for maize production, a meaningful improvement with no increase in data collection costs. Retrieval cues are less successful and community anchors can exacerbate the bias. None of the strategies help to ease the recall bias for happiness reports.
dc.identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/163242
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/102362
dc.languageen
dc.publisherOxford University Press
dc.relationhttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/143409
dc.relationhttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/146341
dc.relationhttps://doi.org/10.2499/p15738coll2.134161
dc.relationhttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/154278
dc.relationhttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/147824
dc.rightsOpen Access
dc.sourceGodlonton, Susan; Hernandez, Manuel A.; and Paz, Cynthia. 2024. European Review of Agricultural Economics 51(4): 1129–1167. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbae026
dc.subjectsurvey design
dc.subjectdata collection
dc.subjectmaize
dc.subjectsmallholders
dc.subjectagriculture
dc.titleCan survey design reduce anchoring bias in recall data? Evidence from smallholder farmers in Malawi
dc.typeJournal Article

Archivos