Political economy of planting for food and jobs input subsidy policy process in Ghana: An application of the Kaleidoscope Model
| dc.creator | Wongnaa, Camillus Abawiera | |
| dc.creator | Babu, Suresh Chandra | |
| dc.creator | Awunyo-Vitor, Dadson | |
| dc.date | 2026-06 | |
| dc.date | 2026-04-24T22:10:14Z | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-06-27T15:38:27Z | |
| dc.description | The Planting for Food and Jobs (PFJ) input subsidy policy was Ghana’s flagship agricultural programme from 2017 to 2025, designed to increase agricultural productivity, enhance food security, create jobs, and improve rural livelihoods through targeted support to smallholder farmers. Despite its prominence, there has been little systematic analysis of the political economy of the policy process that shaped it. This study applies the Kaleidoscope Model of Policy Change (KM), a framework developed for analysing development policy processes, to examine how the PFJ input subsidy policy was placed on the agenda, designed, adopted, and implemented. A qualitative research design was employed, involving 50 key informant interviews with policymakers, programme implementers, farmer-based organisations, and development partners, alongside two focus group discussions with farmers. Data were coded and analysed thematically using the KM framework to identify drivers, enablers, and constraints across the different stages of the policy process. The findings indicate that focusing events and policy coalitions were crucial in placing PFJ on the agenda. Policy design was influenced by the urgency of addressing declining productivity, ideological factors, and cost–benefit assessments. Adoption was shaped by the authority of advocates, the limited resistance of veto players, and favourable political timing, reflecting the perception that presidential initiatives often become policy priorities. Implementation, although constrained by budget shortfalls and logistical challenges, benefited from institutional capacity, budgetary allocations, and sustained advocacy. Overall, PFJ reached its target number of beneficiaries, raised productivity, enhanced food security, created jobs, and reduced dependence on food imports, despite only 69% of planned resources being released. However, limited tailored support for youth and women remains a key gap. The study demonstrates the value of political economy analysis for agricultural policy and recommends structured engagement with the private sector in subsidized input delivery from agenda setting through to implementation. | |
| dc.identifier | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/182638 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/110294 | |
| dc.language | en | |
| dc.publisher | Elsevier | |
| dc.relation | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.04.004 | |
| dc.rights | Open Access | |
| dc.source | Wongnaa, Camillus Abawiera; Babu, Suresh Chandra; and Awunyo-Vitor, Dadson. 2026. Political economy of planting for food and jobs input subsidy policy process in Ghana: An application of the Kaleidoscope Model. Cleaner and Circular Bioeconomy 14(June 2026): 100217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clcb.2026.100217 | |
| dc.subject | capacity building | |
| dc.subject | political ecology | |
| dc.subject | subsidies | |
| dc.subject | models | |
| dc.subject | development programmes | |
| dc.subject | policies | |
| dc.subject | farm inputs | |
| dc.title | Political economy of planting for food and jobs input subsidy policy process in Ghana: An application of the Kaleidoscope Model | |
| dc.type | Journal Article |