MELDING PRIVATE AND PUBLIC INTERESTS IN WATER RIGHTS MARKETS

dc.creatorLynne, Gary D.
dc.creatorSaarinen, Phyllis
dc.date2017-04-01T13:48:18Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-09T03:13:26Z
dc.descriptionThe debate over privatizing and water markets has moved back and forth for decades between the "I" and the "We" perspectives. Rather than either/or, a balanced "I&We" view of water institutions is needed. West is meeting east in water law. Public interest needs must be satisfied in appropriate decision forums, but marketing may prove a social improvement when used as a supplement. Balancing an "I&We" institution involves establishing an acceptable or tolerable level of interference through judicious mixing of state, common and private property regimes. Third-party effects are eliminated as mutual gain arises in a variety of decision forums.
dc.identifierdoi:10.22004/ag.econ.15196
dc.identifierhttps://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/15196/files/25010069.pdf
dc.identifierhttp://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/15196
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/528731
dc.languageeng
dc.publisher
dc.sourcehttp://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/15196
dc.titleMELDING PRIVATE AND PUBLIC INTERESTS IN WATER RIGHTS MARKETS
dc.typeText

Archivos