Reconciling the Rawlsian and the utilitarian approaches to the maximization of social welfare

dc.creatorStark, Oded
dc.creatorJakubek, Marcin
dc.creatorFalniowski, Fryderyk
dc.date2017-04-01T13:55:02Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-09T07:42:49Z
dc.descriptionUnder a deadweight loss of tax and transfer, there is tension between the optimal policy choices of a Rawlsian social planner and a utilitarian social planner. However, when with a weight greater than a certain critical value the individuals’ utility functions incorporate distaste for low relative income, a utilitarian will select exactly the same income distribution as a Rawlsian.
dc.identifierdoi:10.22004/ag.econ.162881
dc.identifierhttps://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/162881/files/ZEFDP184.pdf
dc.identifierhttp://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/162881
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/591378
dc.languageeng
dc.publisher
dc.sourcehttp://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/162881
dc.titleReconciling the Rawlsian and the utilitarian approaches to the maximization of social welfare
dc.typeText

Archivos