Rethinking Forest Partnerships and Benefit Sharing : Insights on Factors and Context that Make Collaborative Arrangements Work for Communities and Landowners
No hay miniatura disponible
Fecha
Autores
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Washington, DC
Resumen
Descripción
Forest-sector collaborative arrangements
come in many forms. The local partner may be a community, an
association, or a set of individual landholders. The outside
partner may be a private organization or a government. The
interest of the local partner may be production of income
from the forest, security of access to land, increased labor
or small business opportunities, protection of traditionally
valued resources, or other values. The interest of the
outside partner may be similarly varied, from securing
access to forest products, to obtaining the cooperation of
the local community in the partner's resource use, to
securing a source of labor, to alleviation of rural poverty,
to production of environmental services and management of
risks. Establishing arrangements that effectively deliver
sustainable forest management and benefit local communities
is a challenge because of the range of participants,
objectives, and scales of partnerships and benefit-sharing
arrangements. This study uses an evidence-based approach to
provide insights into developing and maintaining
collaborative arrangements in the forest sector. It aims to
inform discussions and approaches to forest partnership and
benefit-sharing arrangements. It also offers guidance on how
to implement key factors that influence contract-based
forest partnerships and benefit-sharing arrangements.
Palabras clave
ABBREVIATIONS, ACCESS TO LAND, ACRONYMS, AGRICULTURE, ALLIANCES, ARRANGEMENT, ARRANGEMENTS, ARTICLES, BIBLIOGRAPHY, BINDING, BIODIVERSITY, BOUNDARIES, BUSINESS STRATEGY, CAPACITY BUILDING, CIVIL SOCIETY, CLASSIFICATION, COLLABORATION, COMMUNITIES, COMMUNITIES MANAGEMENT, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT, COMMUNITY MEMBER, COMMUNITY MEMBERS, COMPENSATION, COMPLEXITY, CONFLICT, CONFLICT RESOLUTION, CONFLICT RESOLUTION MECHANISMS, CONFLICTS, CONTENTS, CORE COMPETENCIES, DATA COLLECTION, DECISION MAKING, DECISION-MAKING, DEFORESTATION, DESCRIPTION, DESCRIPTIONS, DISCUSSION, DISCUSSIONS, DISPUTE RESOLUTION, DOCUMENTS, EXTERNALITIES, FINANCIAL SUPPORT, FOREST, FOREST RESOURCE, FOREST RESOURCES, FORESTS, FUEL, FUELWOOD, GLOBALIZATION, GOOD PRACTICE, HOUSEHOLDS, IDEAS, IFC, INDIGENOUS PEOPLES, INFORMATION EXCHANGE, INFORMATION SHARING, INSIGHTS, INTERNATIONAL BANK, INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY, INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE, INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCES, INTERNATIONAL LAW, LAND ADMINISTRATION, LAND RIGHTS, LAND TENURE, LAND USE, LEASING, MEETING, MEETINGS, MODALITIES, MONOGRAPH, MUTUAL RESPECT, NATURAL RESOURCE, NATURAL RESOURCES, NEGOTIATION, NEGOTIATIONS, NONGOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATION, NONGOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS, PARTNERSHIP, PLANTATIONS, PROPERTY RIGHTS, PROTOCOL, PUBLIC GOOD, PUBLIC LANDS, RECONSTRUCTION, REHABILITATION, RESEARCHER, RESOURCE USE, RURAL DEVELOPMENT, SANCTIONS, SELF-DETERMINATION, SETTLEMENT, SITE, SOCIAL RELATIONS, THINKING, USER, USERS, VARIETY, VILLAGES, WEB