Gambling, saving, and lumpy liquidity needs

dc.creatorHerskowitz, Sylvan
dc.date2021-01-01
dc.date2024-05-22T12:10:18Z
dc.date2024-05-22T12:10:18Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-27T14:58:44Z
dc.descriptionI present evidence that unmet liquidity needs for indivisible, “lumpy,” expenditures increase demand for betting as a second-best method of liquidity generation in the presence of financial constraints. With a sample of 1,708 sports bettors in Kampala, Uganda, I show that participants’ targeted payouts are linked to anticipated expenditures, while winnings increase lumpy expenditures disproportionately. I show that a randomized savings treatment decreases demand for betting. And I use two lab-in-the-field experiments to show that unmet liquidity needs and saving ability are important mechanisms. These results cannot be explained by betting as a purely normal good. (JEL C93, D81, G51, L83, O12, O16)
dc.identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/142317
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/91034
dc.languageen
dc.publisherAmerican Economic Association
dc.rightsLimited Access
dc.sourceHerskowitz, Sylvan. 2021. Gambling, saving, and lumpy liquidity needs. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 13(1): 72-104. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20180177
dc.subjectexpenditure
dc.subjectliquidity
dc.subjectsavings
dc.titleGambling, saving, and lumpy liquidity needs
dc.typeJournal Article

Archivos