Irrigation financing and cost recovery policy in India: Case studies from Bihar and Haryana

dc.creatorBhatia, Ramesh
dc.date1990
dc.date2024-10-24T12:46:52Z
dc.date2024-10-24T12:46:52Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-27T15:32:54Z
dc.descriptionSeveral recent studies analyze the financial aspects of public irrigation systems in Asia. Repetto (1937) points out that governments collect from user fees on average less than 10 percent of the full costs of irrigation services; government subsidies range from 75 to 99 percent. Among the widespread problems encouraged by subsidies are chronic excess demand for water and water projects, poor operation and maintenance of completed systems, and inattention to water conservation opportunities. n a multicountry study of financing and cost recovery mechanisms in Asia, Small and others (1986) conclude that it is probably not feasible to collect irrigation service fees based on the volune of water used because of two factors: the inability of most agencies to measure water consumption accurately at the turnout ard the administrative costs of collecting fees from the large nurrber of individual farmers usually found in the irrigation system:: of developing countries. There does, however, appear to be sccpe for charging organized groups of farmers served from a common canal.
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/157032
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/107485
dc.languageen
dc.publisherInternational Food Policy Research Institute
dc.rightsOpen Access
dc.sourceBhatia, Ramesh. 1990. Irrigation financing and cost recovery policy in India: Case studies from Bihar and Haryana. Occasional Papers. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute. https://hdl.handle.net/10568/157032
dc.subjectagriculture
dc.titleIrrigation financing and cost recovery policy in India: Case studies from Bihar and Haryana
dc.typeBook Chapter

Archivos