Beyond Quality at Entry

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.creatorMollard, Ingrid
dc.creatorBrearley, Emily
dc.creatorVyzaki, Marialena
dc.creatorTaivalmaa, Sanna-Liisa
dc.date2015-05-19T17:13:45Z
dc.date2015-05-19T17:13:45Z
dc.date2015-04
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-01T00:44:38Z
dc.descriptionThe objective of this study was to go beyond a standard gender review of project design to increase knowledge of how and to what extent World Bank agriculture projects address gender issues during implementation. The study introduces a tool to track gender mainstreaming in the implementation phase of a project. The tool is then used to review the portfolio of current agriculture projects, establish a baseline, and suggest targets for gender mainstreaming for the future portfolio. There is a need to move beyond quality at entry to have a more realistic picture of gender mainstreaming in projects. The Agriculture Action Plan (2013-15) explicitly emphasizes the importance of reducing gender inequality in access to assets, services, collective action, and opportunities. The plan specifies key actions to increase the share of agriculture and rural development projects by 2015. That will (1) include gender analysis in its design, with a target of 100 percent, and (2) include gender mainstreaming in all three dimensions of design (analysis, actions, and ME), with a target of 75 percent. The reason for the 75 percent target is that gender analysis conducted at entry, for a relatively small set of projects, can reveal that gender specific actions and related ME are not needed. The focus on all three elements of design raises the bar for an agriculture project beyond the World Bank standard of satisfactorily addressing at least one of these elements. In addition, from FY15, all agriculture projects will be reviewed by the Gender team in the Agriculture Global Practice (GFADR) in terms of gender mainstreaming at concept note, preparation, and appraisal stages. This review indicates that a rating of gender Informed at entry is no guarantee that a project will successfully mainstream gender during implementation, although it is a good basis for success. In addition, this review shows that it is critical to track gender mainstreaming throughout the project cycle to identify gaps and opportunities in real time. Finally, the review shows that if a project neglects gender during the design phase, it can still catch up during implementation.
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.identifierhttp://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2015/04/24380789/beyond-quality-entry-portfolio-review-gender-implementation-agriculture-projects-fy08-13
dc.identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/10986/21905
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.1596/21905
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/410274
dc.languageEnglish
dc.languageen_US
dc.publisherWorld Bank, Washington, DC
dc.relationAgriculture global practice technical assistance paper;
dc.rightsCC BY 3.0 IGO
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/
dc.rightsWorld Bank
dc.subjectAGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT
dc.subjectAGRICULTURAL EXTENSION
dc.subjectCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
dc.subjectDESCRIPTION
dc.subjectDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
dc.subjectECONOMIC EMPOWERMENT
dc.subjectEQUAL ACCESS
dc.subjectFARMS
dc.subjectFEMALE
dc.subjectFEMALE FARMERS
dc.subjectFOOD PROCESSING
dc.subjectGENDER
dc.subjectGENDER ACTION
dc.subjectGENDER ANALYSES
dc.subjectGENDER ANALYSIS
dc.subjectGENDER ASSESSMENT
dc.subjectGENDER ASYMMETRIES
dc.subjectGENDER CONCERNS
dc.subjectGENDER CONSIDERATIONS
dc.subjectGENDER DIMENSION
dc.subjectGENDER DIMENSIONS
dc.subjectGENDER DISPARITIES
dc.subjectGENDER EQUALITY
dc.subjectGENDER EXPERTISE
dc.subjectGENDER GAP
dc.subjectGENDER GAPS
dc.subjectGENDER IMPACT
dc.subjectGENDER INDICATORS
dc.subjectGENDER INEQUALITY
dc.subjectGENDER ISSUES
dc.subjectGENDER MAINSTREAMING
dc.subjectGENDER NEUTRAL
dc.subjectGENDER RELATIONS
dc.subjectGENDER ROLES
dc.subjectGENDER SENSITIVE
dc.subjectGENDER SPECIALIST
dc.subjectGENDER SPECIALISTS
dc.subjectGENDER STUDIES
dc.subjectGENDER TRAINING
dc.subjectGENDER UNITS
dc.subjectHOUSEHOLDS
dc.subjectHUMAN RESOURCES
dc.subjectIMPACT ASSESSMENTS
dc.subjectIMPLEMENTATION OF GENDER MAINSTREAMING
dc.subjectINCOMES
dc.subjectINSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY
dc.subjectINTEGRATION
dc.subjectINTEGRATION OF GENDER
dc.subjectINTERVENTION
dc.subjectINTERVENTIONS
dc.subjectLABOR FORCE
dc.subjectLIVESTOCK
dc.subjectMARKETING
dc.subjectNEW TECHNOLOGIES
dc.subjectNGOS
dc.subjectNONGOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS
dc.subjectOPPORTUNITIES FOR WOMEN
dc.subjectPRODUCTIVITY
dc.subjectREHABILITATION
dc.subjectRESETTLEMENT
dc.subjectRURAL AREAS
dc.subjectRURAL DEVELOPMENT
dc.subjectSOCIAL DEVELOPMENT
dc.subjectSOCIAL WELFARE
dc.subjectWOMEN FARMERS
dc.subjectWOMEN IN AGRICULTURE
dc.subjectWOMEN IN LEADERSHIP
dc.subjectWOMEN PRODUCERS
dc.titleBeyond Quality at Entry
dc.titlePortfolio Review on Gender Implementation of Agriculture Projects (FY08-13)
dc.typeReport
dc.typeRapport
dc.typeInforme

Archivos

Colecciones

AgroKnow