Calibrating Dissimilar Payment Vehicles in Contingent Valuation Studies: An Example of Reducing Hydrilla in Two North Florida Spring-Fed River Systems

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.creatorThomas, Victoria
dc.creatorThomas, Michael H.
dc.date2017-04-01T16:41:27Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-09T06:47:53Z
dc.descriptionChoice of payment vehicle (PV) is important to contingent-valuation practitioners. They are often left using scenarios that may elicit bias responses; for example hypothetical gate fees in open access areas. Utility bills may avoid bias, but introduce a scaling problem. A survey of north-Florida spring-based recreation calibrates these two dissimilar PVs.
dc.identifierdoi:10.22004/ag.econ.142981
dc.identifierhttps://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/142981/files/ThomasSAEA2013.pdf
dc.identifierhttp://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/142981
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/580914
dc.languageeng
dc.publisher
dc.sourcehttp://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/142981
dc.titleCalibrating Dissimilar Payment Vehicles in Contingent Valuation Studies: An Example of Reducing Hydrilla in Two North Florida Spring-Fed River Systems
dc.typeText

Archivos

Colecciones

University of Minnesota