Comparison of three calibration methods for modeling rice phenology

dc.creatorGao, Yujing
dc.creatorWallach, Daniel
dc.creatorLiu, Bing
dc.creatorDingkuhn, Michael
dc.creatorBoote, Kenneth J.
dc.creatorSingh, Upendra
dc.creatorAsseng, Senthold
dc.creatorKahveci, Tamer
dc.creatorHe, Jianqiang
dc.creatorZhang, Ruoyang
dc.creatorConfalonieri, Roberto
dc.creatorHoogenboom, Gerrit
dc.date2020-01
dc.date2024-12-19T12:54:02Z
dc.date2024-12-19T12:54:02Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-27T04:12:17Z
dc.identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/164570
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/25012
dc.languageen
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.sourceGao, Yujing; Wallach, Daniel; Liu, Bing; Dingkuhn, Michael; Boote, Kenneth J.; Singh, Upendra; Asseng, Senthold; Kahveci, Tamer; He, Jianqiang; Zhang, Ruoyang; Confalonieri, Roberto and Hoogenboom, Gerrit. 2020. Comparison of three calibration methods for modeling rice phenology. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, Volume 280 p. 107785
dc.subjectatmospheric science
dc.subjectagronomy and crop science
dc.subjectglobal and planetary change
dc.subjectforestry
dc.titleComparison of three calibration methods for modeling rice phenology
dc.typeJournal Article

Archivos