Comparing FISP to Alternative Programs
| dc.creator | Ricker-Gilbert, Jacob | |
| dc.creator | Lunduka, Rodney | |
| dc.creator | Shively, Gerald | |
| dc.creator | Jayne, Thom | |
| dc.date | 2017-04-01T17:27:13Z | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-07-09T10:27:48Z | |
| dc.description | Malawi has made the Farm Input subsidy Program (FISP) the major pillar of both the country’s agricultural development strategy and its social protection policies since 2005/06. Expenditure on the FISP has been high, ranging from 5.6% of the national budget in 2005/06 to 16.2% of the national budget in 2008/09. The general findings on FISP impacts are that the program has made a relatively small positive contribution to maize production and farm income. However, the program’s impact on rural poverty remains unclear. | |
| dc.identifier | doi:10.22004/ag.econ.234942 | |
| dc.identifier | https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/234942/files/Policy_brief_4.pdf | |
| dc.identifier | http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/234942 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/618976 | |
| dc.language | eng | |
| dc.publisher | ||
| dc.source | http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/234942 | |
| dc.title | Comparing FISP to Alternative Programs | |
| dc.type | Text |