Using PES to Implement REDD

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.creatorPagiola, Stefano
dc.date2014-04-17T16:15:45Z
dc.date2014-04-17T16:15:45Z
dc.date2011-01
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-01T01:01:02Z
dc.descriptionPayments for Environmental Services (PES) are one of the instruments that countries might use to try to reduce deforestation, and hence receive payments for Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation (REDD). This paper discusses four aspects related to the use of PES as an instrument to implement an avoided deforestation program, based on a review of PES experiences in Latin America. First, the paper discusses the applicability of PES in the context of REDD. PES is only one of the instruments that can be used to reduce deforestation. Some types of deforestation problems may not be amenable to the use of PES, while others might be better addressed with other instruments. Second, the paper examines the evidence on the effectiveness of PES as a tool to reduce deforestation. Although it seems intuitive to think that paying for forest conservation would reduce deforestation, the available evidence from existing PES programs is mixed. Third, the paper discusses several welfare considerations arising from the possible use of PES as a tool to reduce deforestation. That REDD be implemented in ways that do not harm the welfare of forest-dependent peoples has been an important part of the debate.
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.formattext/plain
dc.identifierhttp://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2011/01/19304438/using-payments-environmental-services-pes-implement-reduced-emissions-deforestation-forest-degradation-redd
dc.identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/10986/17892
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.1596/17892
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/414254
dc.languageEnglish
dc.languageen_US
dc.publisherWorld Bank, Washington, DC
dc.relationPayments for Environmental Services (PES) learning paper;no. 2011-1
dc.rightsCC BY 3.0 IGO
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/
dc.subjectAGRICULTURAL INTENSIFICATION
dc.subjectAGRICULTURAL LAND
dc.subjectAGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION
dc.subjectAGRICULTURE
dc.subjectAMAZON DEFORESTATION
dc.subjectAREA OF FOREST
dc.subjectASYMMETRIC INFORMATION
dc.subjectBASIN FOREST
dc.subjectBIODIVERSITY
dc.subjectBIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
dc.subjectBUSINESS AS USUAL SCENARIO
dc.subjectCARBON EMISSIONS
dc.subjectCARBON FINANCE
dc.subjectCARBON MARKETS
dc.subjectCARBON PRICES
dc.subjectCARBON SEQUESTRATION
dc.subjectCARBON SEQUESTRATION SERVICES
dc.subjectCLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM
dc.subjectCLIMATE
dc.subjectCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION
dc.subjectCO2
dc.subjectCOASTAL PLAIN
dc.subjectCOLLECTIVE ACTION
dc.subjectCOLORS
dc.subjectCOMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
dc.subjectCOMPENSATION
dc.subjectCONSERVATION AREA
dc.subjectCONSERVATION AREAS
dc.subjectCONSERVATION BIOLOGY
dc.subjectCOUNTRY'S FOREST AREA
dc.subjectDEFORESTATION
dc.subjectDEFORESTATION RATES
dc.subjectDEGRADATION OF FORESTS
dc.subjectDRIVERS OF DEFORESTATION
dc.subjectECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS
dc.subjectECONOMIC MODELS
dc.subjectECONOMISTS
dc.subjectECOSYSTEM
dc.subjectECOSYSTEM SERVICES
dc.subjectEMISSIONS
dc.subjectEMISSIONS FROM DEFORESTATION
dc.subjectEMPIRICAL ANALYSIS
dc.subjectENVIRONMENTAL
dc.subjectENVIRONMENTAL DECISIONS
dc.subjectENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS
dc.subjectENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMIST
dc.subjectENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTIVENESS
dc.subjectENVIRONMENTAL SERVICE
dc.subjectENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
dc.subjectEQUILIBRIUM
dc.subjectEXPENDITURES
dc.subjectEXTERNALITY
dc.subjectFARMS
dc.subjectFOREST
dc.subjectFOREST AREA
dc.subjectFOREST AREAS
dc.subjectFOREST CARBON
dc.subjectFOREST CARBON STOCKS
dc.subjectFOREST CONSERVATION
dc.subjectFOREST COVER
dc.subjectFOREST DEGRADATION
dc.subjectFOREST ECOLOGY
dc.subjectFOREST FIRES
dc.subjectFOREST FUND
dc.subjectFOREST INVESTMENT
dc.subjectFOREST LOSS
dc.subjectFOREST MANAGEMENT
dc.subjectFOREST MANAGERS
dc.subjectFOREST PRODUCTS
dc.subjectFOREST PROTECTION
dc.subjectFOREST REGENERATION
dc.subjectFORESTRY
dc.subjectFORESTS
dc.subjectFRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON CLIMATE CHANGE
dc.subjectGHGS
dc.subjectGLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE
dc.subjectGLOBAL ENVIRONMENT FACILITY
dc.subjectGOLD
dc.subjectGREENHOUSE
dc.subjectGREENHOUSE GASES
dc.subjectHETEROGENEITY
dc.subjectINTERNATIONAL FOREST CARBON
dc.subjectIRRIGATION
dc.subjectLABOR MARKETS
dc.subjectLAND ABANDONMENT
dc.subjectLAND DEGRADATION
dc.subjectLAND ECONOMICS
dc.subjectLAND TENURE
dc.subjectLAND USE
dc.subjectLAND USE PRACTICES
dc.subjectLAND USER
dc.subjectLAND USERS
dc.subjectLAND USES
dc.subjectLANDS
dc.subjectLANDSCAPE
dc.subjectLOGGING
dc.subjectLOW-CARBON
dc.subjectMANAGED FORESTS
dc.subjectNATURAL RESOURCE
dc.subjectNATURAL RESOURCE DEGRADATION
dc.subjectNATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
dc.subjectNATURAL RESOURCES
dc.subjectOPEN ACCESS
dc.subjectOPPORTUNITY COSTS
dc.subjectPARTNERSHIP
dc.subjectPASTURE
dc.subjectPERVERSE INCENTIVES
dc.subjectPOPULATION GROWTH
dc.subjectPOSITIVE EXTERNALITIES
dc.subjectPRESENT VALUE
dc.subjectPRODUCERS
dc.subjectPROPERTY RIGHTS
dc.subjectPUBLIC LANDS
dc.subjectRATES OF DEFORESTATION
dc.subjectREDUCING EMISSIONS
dc.subjectRESOURCE MANAGEMENT
dc.subjectSILVER
dc.subjectSUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
dc.subjectSUSTAINABLE MANAGEMENT
dc.subjectSUSTAINABLE MANAGEMENT OF FORESTS
dc.subjectTIMBER
dc.subjectTIMBER FOREST PRODUCTS
dc.subjectTIMBER HARVESTING
dc.subjectTIMBER PRODUCTS
dc.subjectTOTAL EMISSIONS
dc.subjectTRADEOFFS
dc.subjectTRANSACTION COSTS
dc.subjectTREES
dc.subjectTROPICAL DEFORESTATION
dc.subjectTROPICAL FOREST
dc.subjectTROPICAL FOREST CONSERVATION
dc.subjectTROPICAL FORESTS
dc.subjectTROPICS
dc.subjectUNEP
dc.subjectWATERSHED
dc.subjectWELFARE EFFECTS
dc.subjectWILDLIFE
dc.titleUsing PES to Implement REDD

Archivos

Colecciones

AgroKnow