Community-based monitoring and accountability forums and public service delivery in Uganda: Impact and the role of information, deliberation, and administrative placement

dc.creatorVan Campenhout, Bjorn
dc.creatorKabunga, Nassul
dc.creatorMogues, Tewodaj
dc.creatorMiehe, Caroline
dc.date2020-05-01
dc.date2024-05-22T12:09:50Z
dc.date2024-05-22T12:09:50Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-27T15:28:38Z
dc.descriptionThis policy note summarizes findings from an assessment of the impact of community advocacy forums – popularly known as barazas – implemented by the government of Uganda. The key messages from this study include: 1- Barazas are a worthwhile investment. Because barazas impact a large number of households and cost relatively little, the rate of return is generally substantial, even if treatment effects are small in size. 2- A mix of sub-county level and district level barazas is likely to be most effective. While for some outcomes, e.g., agriculture, barazas organized at the sub-county level are most cost-effective, for others, e.g., infrastructure, barazas at the district level provide most value for money. 3- Full barazas, in terms of both information and deliberation, are the best option. Whether the information component or the deliberation component matters more depends on the sector. A full baraza contains both components and costs the same as an information-specific or a deliberation-specific baraza. Best to do a full baraza. 4- Take a long run perspective. Sufficient time needs to pass before outcomes materialize. 5- Do not forget remote households. For some outcomes, barazas may have smaller effects on households that live in remote areas.
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/142032
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/105559
dc.languageen
dc.publisherInternational Food Policy Research Institute
dc.relationhttps://doi.org/10.2499/p15738coll2.133447
dc.relationhttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/148500
dc.relationhttps://doi.org/10.2499/p15738coll2.133751
dc.rightsOpen Access
dc.sourceVan Campenhout, Bjorn; Kabunga, Nassul; Mogues, Tewodaj; and Miehe, Caroline. 2020. Community-based monitoring and accountability forums and public service delivery in Uganda: Impact and the role of information, deliberation, and administrative placement. Project Note May 2020. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). https://doi.org/10.2499/p15738coll2.133725.
dc.subjectfora
dc.subjecthouseholds
dc.subjectcommunity involvement
dc.subjectassessment
dc.subjectadvocacy
dc.subjectpublic services
dc.subjectinformation
dc.titleCommunity-based monitoring and accountability forums and public service delivery in Uganda: Impact and the role of information, deliberation, and administrative placement
dc.typeBrief

Archivos