Community-based monitoring and accountability forums and public service delivery in Uganda: Impact and the role of information, deliberation, and administrative placement
| dc.creator | Van Campenhout, Bjorn | |
| dc.creator | Kabunga, Nassul | |
| dc.creator | Mogues, Tewodaj | |
| dc.creator | Miehe, Caroline | |
| dc.date | 2020-05-01 | |
| dc.date | 2024-05-22T12:09:50Z | |
| dc.date | 2024-05-22T12:09:50Z | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-06-27T15:28:38Z | |
| dc.description | This policy note summarizes findings from an assessment of the impact of community advocacy forums – popularly known as barazas – implemented by the government of Uganda. The key messages from this study include: 1- Barazas are a worthwhile investment. Because barazas impact a large number of households and cost relatively little, the rate of return is generally substantial, even if treatment effects are small in size. 2- A mix of sub-county level and district level barazas is likely to be most effective. While for some outcomes, e.g., agriculture, barazas organized at the sub-county level are most cost-effective, for others, e.g., infrastructure, barazas at the district level provide most value for money. 3- Full barazas, in terms of both information and deliberation, are the best option. Whether the information component or the deliberation component matters more depends on the sector. A full baraza contains both components and costs the same as an information-specific or a deliberation-specific baraza. Best to do a full baraza. 4- Take a long run perspective. Sufficient time needs to pass before outcomes materialize. 5- Do not forget remote households. For some outcomes, barazas may have smaller effects on households that live in remote areas. | |
| dc.format | application/pdf | |
| dc.identifier | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/142032 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/105559 | |
| dc.language | en | |
| dc.publisher | International Food Policy Research Institute | |
| dc.relation | https://doi.org/10.2499/p15738coll2.133447 | |
| dc.relation | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/148500 | |
| dc.relation | https://doi.org/10.2499/p15738coll2.133751 | |
| dc.rights | Open Access | |
| dc.source | Van Campenhout, Bjorn; Kabunga, Nassul; Mogues, Tewodaj; and Miehe, Caroline. 2020. Community-based monitoring and accountability forums and public service delivery in Uganda: Impact and the role of information, deliberation, and administrative placement. Project Note May 2020. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). https://doi.org/10.2499/p15738coll2.133725. | |
| dc.subject | fora | |
| dc.subject | households | |
| dc.subject | community involvement | |
| dc.subject | assessment | |
| dc.subject | advocacy | |
| dc.subject | public services | |
| dc.subject | information | |
| dc.title | Community-based monitoring and accountability forums and public service delivery in Uganda: Impact and the role of information, deliberation, and administrative placement | |
| dc.type | Brief |
