Practical diets formulated with different plant-based energy ingredients modulate nutrient utilization and gut morphology in tambaqui (Colossoma macropomum).

No hay miniatura disponible

Fecha

Título de la revista

ISSN de la revista

Título del volumen

Editor

Resumen

Descripción

Despite the increasing use of plant-based energy ingredients in aquaculture, few studies have evaluated the digestibility of practical diets formulated with these ingredients in an integrated manner with the metabolic responses, intestinal health, and productive performance of fish. This limits the understanding of their nutritional effects. This study evaluated the apparent digestibility of nutrients and energy from starch-rich practical diets and their effects on growth performance, intestinal fold histomorphometry, and metabolic and physiological profiles of tambaqui (Colossoma macropromum). One hundred and ninety-two tambaqui juveniles (131.63 ± 1.94 g) were fed six experimental, pelleted diets formulated with corn (CO), cornstarch (CS), sorghum (SO), wheat bran (WB), rice bran (RB), or broken rice (BR). The apparent digestibility coefficients of dry matter (ADCDM), organic matter (ADCOM), ether extract (ADCEE), crude protein (ADCCP), gross energy (ADCGE), and starch (ADCST) were analyzed. ADCDM (31.8%–71.9%), ADCOM (44.5%–76.6%), and ADCGE (48.0%–72.6%) varied among the diets but followed a similar pattern: values for the diets with CO (63.3%, 71.7%, and 72.6%, respectively), CS (71.9%, 76.6%, and 79.2%, respectively), and broken bran (65.6%, 72.4%, and 72.5%, respectively) were higher than those for the diets with WB (41.0%, 52.2%, and 53.8%, respectively) and RB (31.8%, 44.5%, and 48.0%, respectively). ADCCP and ADCEE were > 70% in all diets, except that with WB. ADCST was > 90% for all diets. Plasma glucose and serum cholesterol concentrations were similar across treatments. Diets including WB and RB resulted in less-developed intestinal folds, which led to lower digestibility and, consequently, reduced growth. In contrast, diets formulated with SO, BR, or CS proved to be viable alternatives to the CO-based diet, promoting comparable nutrient and energy digestibility. Tambaqui exhibited metabolic adaptation to the physicochemical properties of these formulations, maintaining productive performance. However, the inclusion of WB and RB should be limited because of the high fiber content, which can compromise intestinal health and nutrient utilization efficiency.

Palabras clave

Intestinal morphology, Plant energy sources, Colossoma Macropomum, Tambaqui, Growth performance

Citación