FAIR, POSTFAIR, AND NOFAIR: A COMPARISON OF CROPPING ALTERNATIVES FOR THE SOUTHERN GREAT PLAINS

dc.creatorBiermacher, Jon T.
dc.creatorEpplin, Francis M.
dc.creatorKeim, Kent R.
dc.date2017-04-01T19:37:45Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-09T04:24:51Z
dc.descriptionThe Federal Agriculture Improvement and Reform Act of 1996 was promoted as legislation that would enable and encourage farmers to base planting decisions on market incentives rather than commodity programs. Data from a designed experiment are used to compare the economics of three cropping systems for alternative commodity programs.
dc.identifierdoi:10.22004/ag.econ.35211
dc.identifierhttps://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/35211/files/sp03bi01.pdf
dc.identifierhttp://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/35211
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/549549
dc.languageeng
dc.publisher
dc.sourcehttp://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/35211
dc.titleFAIR, POSTFAIR, AND NOFAIR: A COMPARISON OF CROPPING ALTERNATIVES FOR THE SOUTHERN GREAT PLAINS
dc.typeText

Archivos