Investment in agricultural productivity vs rural commercialization: which way to rapid poverty reduction in Ethiopia?

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.coverageEthiopia
dc.creatorAragie, A. E.;Balié, J.;McDonald, S.
dc.date2023-04-27T11:35:38Z
dc.date2023-04-27T11:35:38Z
dc.date2016
dc.date2018-01-09T19:28:49.0000000Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-27T20:37:54Z
dc.descriptionDeveloping countries identify a set of strategic objectives to promote agricultural production, and assure food security and reduced level of poverty. Two of these objectives are (i) sustainable increase in agricultural productivity, and (ii) accelerated agricultural commercialization. Each of these objectives is backed-up by a long-list of priority investment areas. However, most of these countries lack the financial and technical capacity to execute both of the strategic objectives and all inv estment areas. In light of this, taking the case of Ethiopia as an example, this study employs an economy-wide model and assesses the relative efficiency of alternative investment options on agricultural performance and poverty reduction. Results show that the policy instruments chosen cause significantly different production and welfare responses. Productivity enhancing interventions such as input subsidy and irrigation provision have superior welfare consequences, while policies aimed at small holder commercialization have the least effect.
dc.format22 p.
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.identifierhttps://openknowledge.fao.org/handle/20.500.14283/BP136E
dc.identifierhttp://www.fao.org/3/a-bp136e.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/199878
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherFAO ;
dc.rightsFAO
dc.titleInvestment in agricultural productivity vs rural commercialization: which way to rapid poverty reduction in Ethiopia?
dc.titleInvestment in agricultural productivity vs rural commercialization: which way to rapid poverty reduction in Ethiopia?
dc.typeDocument

Archivos

Colecciones

Productos de conocimiento