Reducing the Social Cost of Federal Crop Insurance: A Role for US Government Hedging with Weather Derivatives

dc.creatorChung, Wonho
dc.date2017-04-01T19:56:47Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-09T08:12:20Z
dc.descriptionPrevious studies have shown that weather derivatives are an effective means of hedging agricultural production risk. Yet, it is still unclear what role weather derivatives will play in agriculture as a risk management tool as compared with existing crop insurance programs which depend highly on government subsidies. This study compares the hedging cost and effectiveness of weather options and crop insurance for soybean in southern Minnesota. Our results show that the hedging effectiveness of weather options is limited at the farm level while the effectiveness increases as the level of aggregation increases. Thus, individual farmers will continue to prefer the federal crop insurance program to weather derivatives for their production risk management. However, the US government as an insurer, which currently does not hedge its risk exposures taken from farmers in the federal crop insurance program, could reduce the implied social cost in the form of un-hedged risk exposure by use of the weather options in the financial market.
dc.identifierdoi:10.22004/ag.econ.175745
dc.identifierhttps://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/175745/files/36_2_1.pdf
dc.identifierhttp://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/175745
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/596646
dc.languageeng
dc.publisher
dc.sourcehttp://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/175745
dc.titleReducing the Social Cost of Federal Crop Insurance: A Role for US Government Hedging with Weather Derivatives
dc.typeText

Archivos