Sampling methods of symphylids in pineapple (Ananas comosus L.) crops in Santander, Colombia

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.audienceInvestigador
dc.coverageSantander
dc.coverageColombia
dc.creatorMontes Rodríguez, José Mauricio
dc.creatorOssa Yepes, Juan Felipe
dc.date2024-03-06T22:19:36Z
dc.date2024-03-06T22:19:36Z
dc.date2021-08-18
dc.date2021
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-27T04:30:28Z
dc.descriptionIn the pineapple growing region of Lebrija, Santander, one of the largest such regions in Colombia, five farms were selected, and a sampling of symphylids associated with this crop was carried out in the first months of cultivation in the variety Perolera and hybrid MD2. Two collecting methods were compared: i) the destructive method, with soil inspection around the roots, and ii) the bait-trap method with pieces of potato mixed with soil. These two methods were implemented in the same plots during five bimonthly samplings. Additionally, the percentage of root damage was estimated, defined as the percentage of roots that show bifurcation due to the damage caused by symphylids. All symphylids were identified as Hanseniella sp. Sampling of symphylids based on underground potato bait traps requires fewer samples to estimate population density and is a predictor of root  damage while destructive sampling is not. Consequently, trap sampling could be a useful tool for monitoring and managing symphylids on pineapple. The abundance was related to soil moisture, and not to soil pH.
dc.descriptionPiña
dc.descriptionAnanas comosus
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.identifierhttps://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/agrocol/article/view/93587
dc.identifier2357-3732
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12324/38994
dc.identifier10.15446/agron.colomb.v39n2.93587
dc.identifierreponame:Biblioteca Digital Agropecuaria de Colombia
dc.identifierinstname:Corporación colombiana de investigación agropecuaria AGROSAVIA
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/29809
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.relationAgronomía Colombiana
dc.relation39
dc.relation2
dc.relation208
dc.relation215
dc.relationAgredo, C. E., Chaparro, E., & Zuluaga, J. I. (1988). Observaciones sobre características, distribución y daños de sinfílidos (Sym phyla) y otros organismos del suelo en cultivos de piña, Ananas comosus, del Valle. Acta Agronómica, 38(2), 65–73.
dc.relationCastañeda, R. C. (1998, September). Actualización en el cultivo de la piña [Conference presentation]. Tecnología de producción para los cultivos de plátano, caña y piña en los departamentos de Meta y Guaviare, Villavicencio, Colombia. https://repository. agrosavia.co/handle/20.500.12324/18506
dc.relationDomínguez Camacho, M. (2015). Orden Symphyla. Revista IDE@ - SEA, 34, 1–7
dc.relationEdwards, C. A. (1961). The ecology of Symphyla part III. Factors con trolling soil distributions. Entomologia Experimentalis et Ap plicata, 4(4), 239–256. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1570-7458.1961. tb02139.x
dc.relationGarcía Reyes, A. (1994). Tecnología generada para el cultivo de la piña (Ananas comosus L) en los Santanderes. In R. Salazar, A. García, E. Arévalo, P. A. Moreno, J. R. Galindo, A. Pinón, J. Serna, M. Roa, H. Méndez, J. A. Martínez, C. A. Avila, G. Echeverry, & L. Castro (Eds.), Sistemas de cultivo de la piña. Técnicas de producción, áreas de cultivo y manejo de plagas (pp. 38–42). ICA, PRONATTA
dc.relationGerdeman, B., & Diehl, B. (2021). Biology and control of the garden Symphyla. In N. Kaur (Ed.), Pacific Northwest insect manage ment handbook (pp. N12–N14). Oregon State University
dc.relationGhiglieno, I., Simonetto, A., Orlando, F., Donna, P., Tonni, M., Valenti, L., & Gilioli, G. (2020). Response of the arthropod community to soil characteristics and management in the Franciacorta viticultural area (Lombardy, Italy). Agronomy, 10(5), Article 740. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10050740
dc.relationHammer, Ø., Harper, D. A. T., & Ryan, P. D. (2001). Past: paleon tological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica, 4(1), Article 4.
dc.relationKramarenko, V. V., Nikitenkov, A. N., Matveenko, I. A., Molokov, V. Y., & Vasilenko, Y. S. (2016). Determination of water content in clay and organic soil using microwave oven. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 43, Article 012029. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/43/1/012029
dc.relationLeón Martínez, G. A. (1997, September 25–26). Plagas de im portancia económica en el cultivo de la piña y estrategias para su manejo [Conference presentation]. Curso actual ización en el cultivo de la piña, Villavicencio, Colombia. https://agropecuaria-primotc.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/ permalink/f/193ddca/57BAC_Aleph000051719
dc.relationMalézieux, E., Côte, F., & Bartholomew, D. (2003). Crop environ ment, plant growth and physiology. In D. P. Bartholomew, R. E. Paull, & K. G. Rohrbach (Eds.), The pineapple: botany, production and uses (pp. 69–107). CABI Publishing.
dc.relationMinisterio de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural. (2017). Anuario es tadístico del sector agropecuario 2017: resultados evaluaciones agropecuarias municipales. Grupo de Información y Estadísti cas sectoriales, Oficina Asesora de Planeación y Prospectiva.
dc.relationMorales Granados, J., & López González, J. (2002). El cultivo de la piña Perolera. CORPOICA, PRONATTA.
dc.relationRohrbach, K. G., & Johnson, M. W. (2003). Pest, diseases and weeds. In D. P. Bartholomew, R. E. Paull, & K. G. Rohrbach (Eds.), The pineapple: botany, production and uses (pp. 203–251). CABI Publishing.
dc.relationSaavedra, S. (1990). El cultivo de la piña. In Federación Nacional de Productores de Frutas y Hortalizas, Comité Hortofrutícola del Valle (Ed.), El cultivo de los frutales en el Valle del Cauca (pp. 95–112). Imprenta Departamental del Valle.
dc.relationSalazar-Moncada, D., Correa-Londoño, G., Aristizábal-Quintero, J., Zuluaga-Ramírez, G., & Calle-Osorno, J. (2015). Muestreo de sinfílidos para el diagnóstico y vigilancia en cultivos de cri santemos (Dendranthema grandiflora) en Colombia. Chilean Journal of Agricultural and Animal Sciences, 31(2), 105–114.
dc.relationSarah, J. (1990). Pest damaging pineapple roots. Acta Hor ticulturae, (275), 671–678. https://doi.org/10.17660/ ActaHortic.1990.275.83
dc.relationScheller, U., & Adis, J. (1996). A pictorial key for the symphylan families and genera of the neotropical region south of cen tral Mexico (Myriapoda, Symphyla). Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment, 31(1), 57–61. https://doi.org/10.1076/ SNFE.31.1.57.13316
dc.relationSoler, A., Gaude, J. M., Marie-Alphonsine, P. A., Vinatier, F., Dole, B., Govindin, J. C., Fournier, P., & Queneherve, P. (2011). Development and evaluation of a new method for sampling and monitoring the symphylid population in pineapple. Pest Management Science, 67(9), 1169–1177. https://doi.org/10.1002/ ps.2170
dc.relationUmble, J., Dufour, R., Fisher, G., Fisher, J., Leap, J., & Van Horn, M. (2006). Symphylans: soil pest management options. ATTRA, NCAT
dc.rightsAttribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
dc.sourceAgronomía Colombiana; Vol. 39, Núm 2 (2021):Agronomía Colombiana;p. 208 -215.
dc.subjectPlagas de las plantas - H10
dc.subjectAnanás comosus
dc.subjectCultivo
dc.subjectPlagas de plantas
dc.subjectTrampas
dc.subjectFrutales
dc.subjecthttp://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_386
dc.subjecthttp://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2018
dc.subjecthttp://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16196
dc.subjecthttp://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7879
dc.thumbnailhttps://repository.agrosavia.co/bitstreams/5f21be09-8cb5-4244-b5fb-fac6b1cbdb0e/download
dc.titleSampling methods of symphylids in pineapple (Ananas comosus L.) crops in Santander, Colombia
dc.titleSampling methods of symphylids in pineapple (Ananas comosus L.) crops in Santander, Colombia
dc.typeArtículo científico

Archivos

Colecciones

Científico