The Challenge of Agricultural Pollution

dc.creatorCassou, Emilie
dc.creatorJaffee, Steven M.
dc.creatorRu, Jiang
dc.date2018-01-18T21:06:56Z
dc.date2018-01-18T21:06:56Z
dc.date2018-03-22
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-01T00:31:10Z
dc.descriptionIn emerging East Asia, agricultural output has expanded dramatically over recent decades, primarily as a result of successful efforts to stimulate yield growth. This achievement has increased the availability of food and raw materials in the region, drastically diminished hunger, and more generally provided solid ground for economic development. The intensification of agriculture that has made this possible, however, has also led to serious pollution problems that have adversely affected human and ecosystem health, as well as the productivity of agriculture itself. In the region that currently owes the largest proportion of deaths to the environment, agriculture is often portrayed as a victim of industrial and urban pollution, and this is indeed the case. Yet agriculture is taking a growing toll on economic resources and sometimes becoming a victim of its own success. In parts of China, Vietnam, and the Philippines—the countries studied in The Challenge of Agricultural Pollution—this pattern of highly productive yet highly polluting agriculture has been unfolding with consequences that remain poorly understood. With large numbers of pollutants and sources, agricultural pollution is often undetected and unmeasured. When assessments do occur, they tend to take place within technical silos, and so the different ecological and socioeconomic risks are seldom considered as a whole, while some escape study entirely. However, when agricultural pollution is considered in its entirety, both the significance of its impacts and the relative neglect of them become clear. Meanwhile, growing recognition that a “pollute now, treat later” approach is unsustainable—from both a human health and an agroindustry perspective—has led public and private sector actors to seek solutions to this problem. Yet public intervention has tended to be more reactive than preventive and often inadequate in scale. In some instances, the implementation of sound pollution control programs has also been confronted with incentive structures that do not rank environmental outcomes prominently. Significant potential does exist, however, to reduce the footprint of farms through existing technical solutions, and with adequate and well-crafted government support, its realization is well within reach.
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.identifier978-1-4648-1201-9
dc.identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/10986/29187
dc.identifier10.1596/978-1-4648-1201-9
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1201-9
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/405128
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherWashington, DC: World Bank
dc.relationDirections in Development—Environment and Sustainable Development;
dc.rightsCC BY 3.0 IGO
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo
dc.rightsWorld Bank
dc.subjectAGRICULTURAL POLLUTION
dc.subjectPOLLUTION MANAGEMENT
dc.subjectPESTICIDE RESIDUE
dc.subjectAGRICULTURAL BURNING
dc.subjectSUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURAL INTENSIFICATION
dc.subjectENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
dc.subjectANIMAL FEED ADDITIVES
dc.subjectAGRICULTURAL PLASTICS
dc.subjectAGRICULTURAL POLICY
dc.subjectLIVESTOCK WASTE MANAGEMENT
dc.subjectANIMAL ANTIBIOTICS
dc.subjectNUTRITIONAL TRANSITION
dc.subjectSTRUCTURAL TRANSFORMATION
dc.subjectFERTILIZER RUNOFF
dc.subjectAGRICULTURAL SUBSIDIES
dc.subjectDIETARY TRANSITION
dc.titleThe Challenge of Agricultural Pollution
dc.titleEvidence from China, Vietnam, and the Philippines
dc.typeBook
dc.typeLivre
dc.typeLibro

Archivos

Colecciones