Technology access without impact? An evaluation of Ecuador’s input subsidy program for rice
No hay miniatura disponible
Fecha
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Taylor & Francis
Resumen
Descripción
In many developing economies, agricultural input subsidies are increasingly delivered through public-private partnerships (PPPs), yet rigorous impact evaluations remain scarce, especially in Latin America. This study assesses Ecuador’s Agricultural Input Kit (KIA) program, which distributed over 1 million subsidized packages of certified seeds, fertilizers, and agrochemicals to improve rice productivity and reduce production costs. The analysis draws on household survey data collected in two waves (2014/2015 and 2019/2020), conducted under institutional ethical approval, with written informed consent obtained in person from all participants. We estimate causal effects on adoption, yields, and costs using a Difference-in-Differences (DiD) approach with Propensity Score Matching (PSM). Results show a 37% increase in improved variety adoption among large farms, but no significant yield effects and an 18% decline in adoption among smallholders. These heterogeneous impacts reflect persistent constraints, including credit inaccessibility, a lack of irrigation, and weak extension systems. This study contributes to the limited evidence on input subsidy programs in Latin America’s rice sector and offers two key insights: first, PPPs require better targeting and integration with financial tools like microcredit; second, support services must be tailored to the structural barriers facing smallholder farmers to achieve equitable productivity gains.
Palabras clave
evaluation, rice, smallholder farmers, partnerships, technology adoption, agricultural technology, subsidies