EFFECTS OF EMPHASIZING DECOUPLED VERSUS COUPLED POLICY TOOLS IN THE 2002 FARM BILL
| dc.creator | Knapek, George M. | |
| dc.creator | Outlaw, Joe L. | |
| dc.creator | Anderson, David P. | |
| dc.creator | Sartwelle, James D., III | |
| dc.creator | McCorkle, Dean A. | |
| dc.creator | Raulston, J. Marc | |
| dc.date | 2017-04-01T19:34:41Z | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-07-09T04:24:32Z | |
| dc.description | The 1996 and 2002 farm bills moved government support toward decoupled tools rather than support coupled to production and/or prices. This paper analyzes whether areas with more production risk would prefer decoupled or coupled support. The results indicate areas with more yield risk would prefer decoupled payments and vice versa. | |
| dc.identifier | doi:10.22004/ag.econ.35083 | |
| dc.identifier | https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/35083/files/sp03kn01.pdf | |
| dc.identifier | http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/35083 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/549485 | |
| dc.language | eng | |
| dc.publisher | ||
| dc.source | http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/35083 | |
| dc.title | EFFECTS OF EMPHASIZING DECOUPLED VERSUS COUPLED POLICY TOOLS IN THE 2002 FARM BILL | |
| dc.type | Text |
