Eligibility Thresholds for Minimum Living Guarantee Programs : International Practices and Implications for China
No hay miniatura disponible
Fecha
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
World Bank, Washington, DC
Resumen
Descripción
Using a simple framework, this paper
discusses the underlying reason of the variation of
threshold level in developed countries, from the least
generous 20 percent to around 60 percent of median wage,
with an average of 35 percent. The generosity of minimum
guarantee social assistance programs is deeply rooted in
social values and principles that further underpin the
policy objectives. Many Organizations for Economic
Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries set their
policy targets for minimum living standard programs beyond
basic needs and aim to guarantee a minimum socially
acceptable level for a decent living. Thresholds are also
refined to reflect the differences in family size and
demographic structure, difference in regional cost of living
and changes in prices and local wages. In some countries the
thresholds show some regional variation due to local
discretionary powers of sub-national authorities to set the
threshold depending on the co-financing mechanisms. These
lessons are valuable for China as the Chinese government has
made efforts to standardize the implementation and
management of its own minimum income guarantee (Di Bao)
programs. The policy recommendations for China include
accelerating the convergence of localized approaches,
raising the administrative level for setting thresholds to
higher level, defining the roles of central and local
governments in financing and management, and establishing a
transparent budgetary management system to transfer and
allocate social assistance funds.
Palabras clave
ABSOLUTE POVERTY, ACCESS TO INFORMATION, ACCESS TO JOBS, AGGREGATE POVERTY, ANTI-POVERTY, ANTI-POVERTY PROGRAM, ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS, AVERAGE INCOME, AVERAGE WAGES, BENEFICIARIES, BENEFICIARY, BENEFIT LEVEL, BENEFIT LEVELS, BENEFIT SYSTEMS, CASH BENEFIT, CASH BENEFITS, CASH TRANSFER, CASH TRANSFER PROGRAMS, CASH TRANSFERS, CHILD BENEFIT, COMPULSORY EDUCATION, CONDITIONAL CASH, CONSUMER PRICE INDEX, CONSUMPTION EXPENDITURE, COST OF FOOD, CPI, DISPOSABLE INCOME, ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA, ELIGIBILITY CRITERION, ELIGIBLE BENEFICIARIES, EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE, EMPLOYMENT GENERATION, EMPLOYMENT PROJECT, EXTREME POVERTY, FAMILIES WITH CHILDREN, FAMILY ASSISTANCE, FAMILY BENEFITS, FAMILY INCOME, FEDERAL ASSISTANCE, FINANCIAL PROTECTION, FISCAL CAPACITY, FOOD ASSISTANCE, FOOD CONSUMPTION, FOOD EXPENDITURE, FOOD EXPENDITURES, FOOD NEEDS, FOOD POVERTY, FOOD POVERTY LINE, FOOD PRICE, FOOD SHARE, FOOD STAMP, GUARANTEED MINIMUM INCOME, HEALTH SERVICES, HOUSEHOLD CONSUMPTION, HOUSEHOLD INCOME, HOUSEHOLD SIZE, HOUSEHOLD SURVEY, HOUSEHOLD SURVEY DATA, HOUSING, HOUSING SUBSIDIES, HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, IMPACTS ON POVERTY, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, INCOME GROWTH, INCOME POVERTY, INCOME SECURITY, INCOME SUPPORT, INCOME TRANSFER, INCOME TRANSFERS, INEQUALITY, INFORMAL EMPLOYMENT, INSURANCE, INSURANCE SYSTEMS, LABOR MARKETS, LIVING CONDITION, LIVING CONDITIONS, LIVING STANDARDS, MEANS TEST, MEANS TESTING, MEANS TESTS, MEDICAL EXPENSES, MIG, MINIMUM INCOME, MINIMUM INCOMES, MINIMUM WAGE, MINIMUM WAGES, NATIONAL POVERTY, NATIONAL POVERTY LINE, NATURAL DISASTERS, NEAR POOR, NEEDY FAMILIES, NET INCOME, NUMBER OF CHILDREN, NUTRITION, PENSION, PENSIONS, PER CAPITA INCOME, POLICY GOALS, POLITICAL CONSTRAINTS, POOR, POOR AREAS, POOR COUNTRIES, POOR FAMILIES, POOR HOUSEHOLDS, POOR PEOPLE, POORER AREAS, POORER HOUSEHOLDS, POVERTY LINE, POVERTY REDUCTION, PRIVATE PENSION, PROTECTION SYSTEMS, REGIONAL COST, REGIONAL COST OF LIVING, REGIONAL DIFFERENCES, REGIONAL INFLATION, REGIONAL PRICE, REGIONAL VARIATION, REGRESSION ANALYSIS, RURAL, RURAL AREAS, RURAL BENEFICIARIES, RURAL ECONOMY, RURAL GAP, RURAL INCOME, RURAL POOR, RURAL POOR HOUSEHOLDS, RURAL POPULATION, RURAL POVERTY, RURAL POVERTY LINE, RURAL POVERTY MONITORING, SAFETY NET, SAFETY NET PROGRAMS, SAFETY NETS, SAVINGS, SAVINGS ACCOUNTS, SCHOOL FEEDING, SEVERANCE PAY, SIMULATIONS, SINGLE PARENT, SINGLE PARENTS, SKILLED LABOR, SOCIAL ASSISTANCE, SOCIAL ASSISTANCE LAW, SOCIAL BENEFITS, SOCIAL CONTRACT, SOCIAL FUNDS, SOCIAL INSURANCE, SOCIAL POLICIES, SOCIAL POLICY, SOCIAL PROTECTION, SOCIAL SAFETY NETS, SOCIAL SECURITY, SOCIAL SECURITY PROGRAMS, SOCIAL SERVICE, SOCIAL SERVICES, SOCIAL WELFARE, STATISTICAL ANALYSIS, SUBSISTENCE, TARGETING, TAX CREDITS, TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE, TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT, TRAINING PROGRAMS, UNEMPLOYMENT, UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFIT, WAGE GROWTH, WAR, WELFARE INDICATORS, WELFARE LEVEL, WELFARE PROGRAMS, WELFARE STATES, WELFARE SYSTEM, WELLBEING
