Testing for Budget Constraint Effects in a National Advisory Referendum Survey on the Kyoto Protocol

dc.creatorLi, Hui
dc.creatorBerrens, Robert P.
dc.creatorBohara, Alok K.
dc.creatorJenkins-Smith, Hank C.
dc.creatorSilva, Carol L.
dc.creatorWeimer, David L.
dc.date2017-04-01T14:07:19Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-09T04:12:15Z
dc.descriptionIn contrast to providing standard reminders about remembering household budgets, does asking survey respondents about their discretionary income and its use affect their voting responses in a national advisory referendum survey? We explore this question using U.S. household data from a unique set of multi-mode random samples (telephone and Internet surveys), and an advisory referendum concerning the Kyoto Protocol. The contingent valuation method is applied to estimate household willingness to pay (WTP) for a split-sample treatment: respondents who only received a standard reminder of household budgets (control group) versus respondents who received two mental accounting-type questions on discretionary income and its uses (treatment group). Results indicate that the treatment significantly influences voting responses and lowers estimated household WTP.
dc.identifierdoi:10.22004/ag.econ.31215
dc.identifierhttps://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/31215/files/30020350.pdf
dc.identifierhttp://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/31215
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/546384
dc.languageeng
dc.publisher
dc.sourcehttp://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/31215
dc.titleTesting for Budget Constraint Effects in a National Advisory Referendum Survey on the Kyoto Protocol
dc.typeText

Archivos