Is There Supply Distortion In The Green Box? An Acreage Response Approach

dc.creatorBakhshi, Samira
dc.creatorKerr, William A.
dc.date2017-04-01T16:47:38Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-09T04:48:23Z
dc.descriptionThe shift of the farm subsidies toward programs classified as being decoupled income supports in the WTO’s URAA raises the question of their true impact on production and trade. In this study, we measured the acreage effects of the Canadian whole farm programs under uncertainty. Based on the theoretical discussions regarding the role of the insurance effect in acreage decisions, we extend the theoretical restrictions examined by Chavas and Holt (1990)which enables us to include this effect in our model specification. Hence, we modified the expected utility maximization framework (under the hypothesis that farmers are risk averse) developed by Chavas and Holt (1990) and derived three distinct effects: market effects, the wealth effect, and the insurance effect.
dc.identifierdoi:10.22004/ag.econ.51093
dc.identifierhttps://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/51093/files/CATPRN%20Working%20Paper%202009-04%20Bakhshi-Kerr.pdf
dc.identifierhttp://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/51093
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/555117
dc.languageeng
dc.publisher
dc.sourcehttp://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/51093
dc.titleIs There Supply Distortion In The Green Box? An Acreage Response Approach
dc.typeText

Archivos