Aspekty Ekonomiczne Wybranych Technologii Produkcji Pszenicy Jarej
| dc.creator | Nowak, Anna | |
| dc.creator | Haliniarz, Małgorzata | |
| dc.creator | Kwiatkowski, Cezary | |
| dc.date | 2017-04-01T19:27:50Z | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-07-09T09:05:54Z | |
| dc.description | This paper makes an assessment of economic efficiency of spring wheat’s chosen cultivation technologies differentiated regarding mineral fertilization levels as well as canopy protection methods. An author used Gross Margin category and the set of economic efficiency rates. Survey results showed that technology of agricultural plant production with applying basic fertilization level on lessive soil formed from loess, reach in nutritive components gained an explicit economic advantage what is confirmed by higher level of Gross Margin. Among assessed protection methods in two mineral fertilization levels, the highest Gross Margin was gained by using in spring wheat cultivation – Lintur 70 herbicide, WG (dikamba+ triasulfuron ) and retardant – Cerone 480 SL (etefon). | |
| dc.identifier | doi:10.22004/ag.econ.201790 | |
| dc.identifier | https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/201790/files/16-2-Nowak.pdf | |
| dc.identifier | http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/201790 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/605690 | |
| dc.language | pol | |
| dc.publisher | ||
| dc.source | http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/201790 | |
| dc.title | Aspekty Ekonomiczne Wybranych Technologii Produkcji Pszenicy Jarej | |
| dc.type | Text |