Urea Subsidies and the Decision to Allocate Land to a New Fertilizing Technology: Ex-ante Analysis in Ecuador

dc.creatorAvila-Santamaria, Jorge J.
dc.creatorUseche, Maria P.
dc.date2017-04-01T19:30:40Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-09T10:02:32Z
dc.descriptionThis ex-ante study examines how urea subsidies affect the adoption of a more efficient but labor-intensive existing alternative, Urea Deep Placement (UDP), in some of the major growing regions of Ecuador (Daule and Santa Lucia cantons, Guayas province). A government subsidy covers around 30% of urea fertilizer cost since 2007. Such a public intervention may be favoring to the traditional broadcasting fertilization method, which demands urea more intensively, crowding out improved innovations (i.e. UDP) and becoming an adverse selection mechanism.
dc.identifierdoi:10.22004/ag.econ.229851
dc.identifierhttps://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/229851/files/Avila%20and%20Useche%202016_SAEA.pdf
dc.identifierhttp://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/229851
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/614914
dc.languageeng
dc.publisher
dc.sourcehttp://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/229851
dc.titleUrea Subsidies and the Decision to Allocate Land to a New Fertilizing Technology: Ex-ante Analysis in Ecuador
dc.typeText

Archivos