The robustness of poverty profiles reconsidered

dc.creatorTarp, Finn
dc.creatorSimler, Kenneth R.
dc.creatorMatusse, Cristina
dc.creatorHeltberg, Rasmus
dc.creatorDava, Gabriel
dc.date2002
dc.date2024-10-24T12:44:57Z
dc.date2024-10-24T12:44:57Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-27T15:00:16Z
dc.descriptionPoverty measures and profiles are used increasingly to guide antipoverty policies in low-income countries. An essential element in these analyses is the specification of a poverty line. However, there are many different methods for setting poverty lines, and different methods can yield strikingly different results, with correspondingly different policy implications. Using recent household survey data from Mozambique, this paper explores the differences that occur using the most common poverty line methodologies, the Food Energy Intake (FEI) and the Cost of Basic Needs (CBN) methods, over different levels of geographic specificity. We find that regional and provincial rankings of Foster, Greer, and Thorbecke poverty indices are not robust to the method of poverty line determination, but that the characteristics of the poor are reasonably similar under all methods. The FEI poverty lines often yield counterintuitive results, whereas the family of CBN poverty lines was more robust. Food consumption patterns of the poor show a high degree of substitution among basic staples from one region to another, which is consistent with observed differences in relative food prices, indicating that CBN poverty lines that allow for regional variation in the food consumption bundle may be most appropriate in these settings.
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/156649
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/91784
dc.languageen
dc.publisherInternational Food Policy Research Institute
dc.rightsOpen Access
dc.sourceTarp, Finn; Simler, Kenneth R.; Matusse, Cristina; Heltberg, Rasmus; Dava, Gabriel. 2002. The robustness of poverty profiles reconsidered. FCND Discussion Paper Brief 124. https://hdl.handle.net/10568/156649
dc.subjectpoverty
dc.subjecthousehold surveys
dc.subjectfood consumption
dc.subjectmathematical models
dc.titleThe robustness of poverty profiles reconsidered
dc.typeBrief

Archivos