How Do Ratite Meats Compare with Beef?: Implications for the Ratite Industry

dc.creatorTaylor, Gary
dc.creatorAndrews, Linda
dc.creatorGillespie, Jeffrey M.
dc.creatorSchupp, Alvin R.
dc.creatorPrinyawiwatkul, Witoon
dc.date2017-04-01T19:27:18Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-09T05:13:35Z
dc.descriptionEmu and ostrich meats were compared with beef to identify and quantify their sensory attributes. A sensory panel was used to compare U.S. Department of Agriculture Choice top sirloin beef with emu and ostrich meat, both ground and intact forms. Comparisons of sensory quality and acceptability were made after zero, two, four and six months of frozen storage. Differences in flavor, juiciness and texture were detected between ratite meats and beef (the control). The differences were more pronounced for intact cuts than ground meat, with ratite meat usually being rated inferior to beef. Some differences in sensory acceptability across the sic-month storage period were revealed. Implications for marketing the ratite meats are made based upon the study.
dc.identifierOther:0738-8950
dc.identifierdoi:10.22004/ag.econ.90438
dc.identifierhttps://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/90438/files/JAB16oneE.pdf
dc.identifierhttp://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/90438
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/560749
dc.languageeng
dc.publisher
dc.sourcehttp://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/90438
dc.titleHow Do Ratite Meats Compare with Beef?: Implications for the Ratite Industry
dc.typeText

Archivos