Biofortification, crop adoption and health information: Impact pathways in Mozambique and Uganda

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.creatorde Brauw, Alan
dc.creatorEozenou, Patrick
dc.creatorGilligan, Daniel O.
dc.creatorHotz, Christine
dc.creatorKumar, Neha
dc.creatorMeenakshi, J.V.
dc.date2018-12-10
dc.date2024-06-21T09:06:53Z
dc.date2024-06-21T09:06:53Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-27T15:21:20Z
dc.descriptionBiofortification is a promising strategy to combat micronutrient malnutrition by promoting the adoption of staple food crops bred to be dense sources of specific micronutrients. Research on biofortified orange-fleshed sweet potato (OFSP) has shown that the crop improves the vitamin A status of children who consume as little as 100 grams per day, and intensive promotion strategies improve dietary intakes of vitamin A in field experiments. However, little is known about OFSP adoption behavior, or about the role that nutrition information plays in promoting adoption and changing diet. We report evidence from similar randomized field experiments conducted in Mozambique and Uganda to promote OFSP. We further use causal mediation analysis to study impact pathways for adoption and dietary intakes. Despite different agronomic conditions and sweet potato cropping patterns across the two countries, the project had similar impacts, leading to adoption by 61% to 68% of farmers exposed to the project, and doubling vitamin A intakes in children. In both countries, two intervention models that differed in training intensity and cost had comparable impacts relative to the control group. The project increased the knowledge of key nutrition messages; however, added knowledge of nutrition messages appears to have minimally affected adoption, conditional on assumptions required for causal mediation analysis. Increased vitamin A intakes were largely explained by adoption and not by nutrition knowledge gained, though in Uganda a large share of impacts on vitamin A intakes cannot be explained by mediating variables. Similar impacts could likely have been achieved by reducing the scope of nutrition trainings.
dc.identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/146387
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/101971
dc.languageen
dc.publisherAgricultural and Applied Economics Association
dc.relationhttp://purl.umn.edu/150514
dc.rightsOpen Access
dc.sourcede Brauw, Alan; Eozenou, Patrick; Gilligan, Daniel; Hotz, Christine; Kumar, Neha; and Meenakshi, J.V. 2018. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 100(3): 906–930. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aay005
dc.subjectsweet potato
dc.subjectpotatoes
dc.subjectbiofortification
dc.subjectcrops
dc.subjectvitamin a deficiency
dc.subjectretinol
dc.subjectmicronutrient deficiencies
dc.subjectmalnutrition
dc.subjectnutrition
dc.subjecttrace elements
dc.titleBiofortification, crop adoption and health information: Impact pathways in Mozambique and Uganda
dc.typeJournal Article

Archivos

Colecciones

Instituto Internacional de Investigación sobre Políticas Alimentarias (IFPRI)