Challenges of Accommodating Non-Market Values in Evaluation of Wildfire Suppression in the United States

dc.creatorVenn, Tyron J.
dc.creatorCalkin, David E.
dc.date2017-04-01T18:11:24Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-09T02:57:13Z
dc.descriptionPresently, implementing the 2001 Federal Wildland Fire Management Policy, which requires fire management priorities to be set on the basis of maximising the market and non-market values to be conserved or enhanced, is extremely challenging because those charged with implementing the policy have limited information about the value that society places on non-market resources at risk. This paper considers the problem of accommodating non-market values affected by wildfire in social benefit-cost analysis. There are substantial gaps in scientific understanding about how the spatial and temporal provision of non-market values are affected by wildfire, and considerable challenges in evaluating social welfare change arising from specific wildfire events. This presents serious impediments to adapting price-based decision-support tools, such as the National Fire Management Analysis System, to meaningfully incorporate non-market values. An alternative decision-support framework is proposed that measures departure from the historic range and variability of ecological conditions for those non-market values that are particularly resistant to price-based analysis.
dc.identifierdoi:10.22004/ag.econ.9903
dc.identifierhttps://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/9903/files/sp07ve01.pdf
dc.identifierhttp://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/9903
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/523579
dc.languageeng
dc.publisher
dc.sourcehttp://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/9903
dc.titleChallenges of Accommodating Non-Market Values in Evaluation of Wildfire Suppression in the United States
dc.typeText

Archivos