Condicionalidad y repercusiones de la elaboración de programas en el bienestar de los hogares: comparación de dos programas distintos de transferencia de efectivo en el México rural

dc.coverageMexico
dc.date2023-04-27T12:52:06Z
dc.date2023-04-27T12:52:06Z
dc.date2002
dc.date2018-01-15T21:32:38.0000000Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-27T20:22:11Z
dc.descriptionIn this paper, we examine how the design of cash transfer schemes influences household welfare outcomes with particular reference to the influence of transfers on conditioned outcomes, such as schooling, health and investment. We do this by examining two innovative cash transfer schemes initiated by the Mexican government in the last decade: PROGRESA, which is a national antipoverty scheme directed at chronic rural poverty, and PROCAMPO, which is a scheme designed to compensate farmers for the n egative price effects of NAFTA. The analysis of data collected for an evaluation of PROGRESA suggest that the overall effects of the programmes, as measured by total and food consumption expenditure, are not different. However, PROGRESA leads to greater schooling expenditure and school attendance as well as increased health outcomes. On the other hand, PROCAMPO is found to lead to increased investment in agriculture. The results suggest that conditionality may have little effect in terms of shor t-term welfare outcomes, but do influence both longer-term (human capital) and medium term (productive) investment.
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.identifier2521-1838
dc.identifierhttps://openknowledge.fao.org/handle/20.500.14283/AE029T
dc.identifierhttp://www.fao.org/3/a-ae029t.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/192340
dc.languageTrilingual
dc.relationFAO Agricultural Economics Working Paper
dc.rightsFAO
dc.titleCondicionalidad y repercusiones de la elaboración de programas en el bienestar de los hogares: comparación de dos programas distintos de transferencia de efectivo en el México rural
dc.typeBook (stand-alone)

Archivos