ESTIMATING THE VALUE OF SEQUENTIAL UPDATING SOLUTIONS FOR INTRAYEAR CROP MANAGEMENT

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.creatorMjelde, James W.
dc.creatorDixon, Bruce L.
dc.creatorSonka, Steven T.
dc.date2017-04-01T19:30:50Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-09T04:17:13Z
dc.descriptionResults of comparing updating versus nonupdating modeling assumptions call into question the use of models based on nonupdating strategies as valid representations of actual farmer actions. If farmers are sequential updaters, the results indicate that models assuming no updating are inaccurate. The degree of this inaccuracy ranges between 4% and 10% of profits for the study area. Further, the results indicate that updating appears to be important for both descriptive and prescriptive studies of farmer behavior.
dc.identifierdoi:10.22004/ag.econ.32447
dc.identifierhttps://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/32447/files/14010001.pdf
dc.identifierhttp://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/32447
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/547614
dc.languageeng
dc.publisher
dc.sourcehttp://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/32447
dc.titleESTIMATING THE VALUE OF SEQUENTIAL UPDATING SOLUTIONS FOR INTRAYEAR CROP MANAGEMENT
dc.typeText

Archivos

Colecciones

University of Minnesota