How are REDD+ proponents addressing tenure problems? Evidence from Brazil, Cameroon, Tanzania, Indonesia, and Vietnam

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.creatorSunderlin, William D.
dc.creatorLarson, A.M.
dc.creatorDuchelle, Amy E.
dc.creatorResosudarmo, I.A.P.
dc.creatorHuynh Thu Ba
dc.creatorAwono, A.
dc.creatorDokken, T.
dc.date2014-03
dc.date2018-07-03T11:03:39Z
dc.date2018-07-03T11:03:39Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-27T14:03:45Z
dc.identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/95819
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/72689
dc.languageen
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.rightsLimited Access
dc.sourceSunderlin, W.D., Larson, A.M., Duchelle, A.E., Resosudarmo, I. A. P., Huynh Thu Ba, Awono, A., Dokken, T. . 2014. How are REDD+ proponents addressing tenure problems? Evidence from Brazil, Cameroon, Tanzania, Indonesia, and Vietnam World Development, 55 : 37-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.01.013
dc.subjectdeforestation
dc.subjectdegraded forests
dc.subjectclimate change
dc.subjecttenure rights
dc.subjectproperty rights
dc.subjectequity
dc.subjectlivelihoods
dc.titleHow are REDD+ proponents addressing tenure problems? Evidence from Brazil, Cameroon, Tanzania, Indonesia, and Vietnam
dc.typeJournal Article

Archivos

Colecciones

Centro para la Investigación Forestal Internacional (CIFOR)