Should Aid Reward Performance?

dc.creatorOlken, Benjamin A.
dc.creatorOnishi, Junko
dc.creatorWong, Susan
dc.date2015-09-17T18:30:36Z
dc.date2015-09-17T18:30:36Z
dc.date2014-10
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-01T00:57:19Z
dc.descriptionWe report an experiment in 3,000 villages that tested whether incentives improve aid efficacy. Villages received block grants for maternal and child health and education that incorporated relative performance incentives. Subdistricts were randomized into incentives, an otherwise identical program without incentives, or control. Incentives initially improved preventative health indicators, particularly in underdeveloped areas, and spending efficiency increased. While school enrollments improved overall, incentives had no differential impact on education, and incentive health effects diminished over time. Reductions in neonatal mortality in nonincentivized areas did not persist with incentives. We find no systematic scoring manipulation nor funding reallocation toward richer areas.
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.identifierAmerican Economic Journal: Applied Economics
dc.identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/10986/22639
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.1596/22639
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/413455
dc.languageen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Economic Association
dc.rightsCC BY 3.0 IGO
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo
dc.rightsAmerican Economic Association
dc.subjecthealth policy
dc.subjecteducation policy
dc.subjectfamily planning
dc.subjecteconomic development
dc.subjecthuman development
dc.subjectforeign aid
dc.subjectneonatal mortality
dc.subjectaid efficacy
dc.subjectperformance incentives
dc.titleShould Aid Reward Performance?
dc.titleEvidence from a Field Experiment on Health and Education in Indonesia
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.typeArticle de journal
dc.typeArtículo de revista

Archivos

Colecciones