Are Malawi’s maize and soya trade restrictions causing more harm than good? A summary of evidence and practical alternatives

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.creatorEdelman, Brent
dc.creatorBaulch, Bob
dc.date2016-06-24
dc.date2024-06-21T09:06:45Z
dc.date2024-06-21T09:06:45Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-27T14:55:19Z
dc.descriptionSince the early 2000s, the government of Malawi has used trade restrictions, export bans in particular, to control trade flows for maize and soya, among other crops. Maize export bans, justified in the name of national food security, have been in place more or less continuously since 2005, with the ban lifted temporarily in 2007-08 and 2009-11. Export bans on soya, used to benefit domestic vegetable oil processors and the poultry industry in the form of lower input prices, were imposed several times for a few months at a time between 2010 and 2012. In 2013, government scrapped soya export bans as a trade policy tool, but since 2015 has explored other measures to limit soya exports, including an export levy and a mandate that all soya exports be processed through a single trading company.
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/146355
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/89461
dc.languageen
dc.publisherInternational Food Policy Research Institute
dc.rightsOpen Access
dc.sourceEdelman, Brent; and Baulch, Bob. 2016. Are Malawi’s maize and soya trade restrictions causing more harm than good? A summary of evidence and practical alternatives. MaSSP Policy Note 25. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). https://hdl.handle.net/10568/146355
dc.subjectsoybean
dc.subjectexports
dc.subjectmaize
dc.subjecttrade barriers
dc.subjecttrade policies
dc.subjecttrade
dc.titleAre Malawi’s maize and soya trade restrictions causing more harm than good? A summary of evidence and practical alternatives
dc.typeBrief

Archivos

Colecciones

Instituto Internacional de Investigación sobre Políticas Alimentarias (IFPRI)