Polycentricity and multi-stakeholder platforms: Governance of the commons in India

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.creatorElDidi, Hagar
dc.creatorRawat, Shivanyaa
dc.creatorMeinzen-Dick, Ruth S.
dc.creatorChaturvedi, Rahul
dc.date2021-12-06
dc.date2024-05-22T12:13:46Z
dc.date2024-05-22T12:13:46Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-27T15:08:41Z
dc.descriptionCommons governance is complex and polycentric, involving a range of actors, working at different scales with different concepts of ‘development’, and different types of power. Multi-stakeholder platforms (MSPs) have generated considerable attention as a way to address these tensions among multiple and overlapping decision-making centers operating on different administrative levels and scales. Yet establishing MSPs that effectively involve both community, government, and private sector actors is far from straightforward. This paper analyzes the Indian NGO Foundation for Ecological Security’s (FES) experience of strengthening polycentric governance through case studies of two MSPs in Gujarat and Odisha, at the block (subdistrict) level—a meso-level encompassing multiple communities situated around a commons landscape (hill range or small rivulet). By comparing local environments, institutional arrangements, stakeholder interactions, governance processes and the evolution of MSPs in the two states, it distills lessons on the tangible and intangible benefits of multi-stakeholder engagement, scale, and enabling conditions. We argue that the groundwork carried to build community level collective action supports effective polycentric governance of resources on the landscape level, especially through block-level MSPs that facilitate inter-community collaboration and learning, strengthening local voices and building trust between stakeholders over time. The cases also highlight that MSPs can evolve in different ways as the various actors interact and aim to influence the agenda. External actors like NGOs thus play an important role as facilitators and through mobilizing communities to help them claim their agency.
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/143388
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/95860
dc.languageen
dc.publisherInternational Food Policy Research Institute
dc.relationhttps://doi.org/10.5751/ES-13168-270202
dc.rightsOpen Access
dc.sourceElDidi, Hagar; Rawat, Shivanyaa; Meinzen-Dick, Ruth Suseela; and Chaturvedi, Rahul. 2021. Polycentricity and multi-stakeholder platforms: Governance of the commons in India. IFPRI Discussion Paper 2067. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). https://doi.org/10.2499/p15738coll2.134845.
dc.subjectcommons
dc.subjectmulti-stakeholder processes
dc.subjectgovernance
dc.titlePolycentricity and multi-stakeholder platforms: Governance of the commons in India
dc.typeWorking Paper

Archivos

Colecciones

Instituto Internacional de Investigación sobre Políticas Alimentarias (IFPRI)