Toxics Regulation Under California's Proposition 65: A State Law with National Effects
| dc.creator | Helfand, Gloria E. | |
| dc.creator | House, Brett W. | |
| dc.creator | Larson, Douglas M. | |
| dc.date | 2017-04-01T15:26:58Z | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-07-09T06:24:50Z | |
| dc.description | When California voters approved Proposition 65 in 1986, some thought its novel approach to regulation of hazardous substances was going to ruin California's economy; others argued that it would significantly improve the environment and people's health. Both claims were greatly exaggerated. While Proposition 65 has contributed to environmental improvement, it also appears to be a law with which Californians and national businesses, including farmers, can live. | |
| dc.identifier | doi:10.22004/ag.econ.131443 | |
| dc.identifier | https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/131443/files/Helfand.pdf | |
| dc.identifier | http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/131443 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/576259 | |
| dc.language | eng | |
| dc.publisher | ||
| dc.source | http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/131443 | |
| dc.title | Toxics Regulation Under California's Proposition 65: A State Law with National Effects | |
| dc.type | Text |
