Métodos de aplicación de biofertilizantes bacterianos

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.audienceTécnico
dc.audienceProductor
dc.coverageCentro de Investigación Tibaitatá
dc.creatorGonzález de Bashan, Luz Estela
dc.creatorLegorreta, Manuel Moreno
dc.creatorHernández, Juan Pablo
dc.creatorMendoza Labrador, Jonathan Alberto
dc.date2022-04-08T20:54:54Z
dc.date2022-04-08T20:54:54Z
dc.date2021
dc.date2021
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-27T05:01:09Z
dc.descriptionEl éxito de la inoculación depende tanto de la efectividad de las bacterias utilizadas como de la tecnología empleada para su aplicación. La razón del uso de inoculantes formulados es simple: con la inoculación de bacterias en suspensión aplicada directamente en el suelo, sin una formulación adecuada, la población de bacterias se ve rápidamente diezmada. Este resultado, combinado con una pobre producción de biomasa bacteriana, la dificultad para mantener la actividad bacteriana en la rizósfera y el estado fisiológico de las bacterias en el momento de la aplicación, puede afectar la concentración de pgpb en la rizósfera. Para obtener una respuesta positiva de la planta, es esencial contar con un número mínimo de células viables, el cual difiere según la especie.La heterogeneidad característica de los suelos es el obstáculo más importante en la inoculación. En algunas ocasiones, las bacterias introducidas pueden encontrar todos los nichos de la rizósfera colonizados por otros microorganismos, por lo que las bacterias introducidas sin protección deben competir con la microflora nativa (a menudo mejor adaptada) y enfrentar la depredación por parte de la microfauna del suelo. Como respuesta, una función importante de cualquier formulación es proporcionar un microambiente más adecuado, así como protección física durante un tiempo prolongado. Las formulaciones empleadas en campo deben diseñarse para proporcionar una fuente confiable de bacterias que puedan sobrevivir en la rizósfera y estar disponibles para los cultivos cuando sea necesario (Bashan et al., 2014; Calvo et al., 2014; Herrmann & Lesueur, 2013).
dc.descriptionCorporación colombiana de investigación agropecuaria - AGROSAVIA
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12324/37082
dc.identifierreponame:Biblioteca Digital Agropecuaria de Colombia
dc.identifierrepourl:https://repository.agrosavia.co
dc.identifierinstname:Corporación colombiana de investigación agropecuaria AGROSAVIA
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/43482
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherCorporación colombiana de investigación agropecuaria - AGROSAVIA
dc.relation176
dc.relation197
dc.relationAlbareda, M., Rodríguez-Navarro, D. N., Camacho, M., & Temprano, F. J. (2008). Alternatives to peat as a carrier for rhizobia inoculants: Solid and liquid formulations. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,40(11), 2.771-2.779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.07.021
dc.relationAmer, G. A., & Utkhede, R. S. (2000). Development of formulations of biological agents for management of root rot of lettuce and cucumber. Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 46(9), 809-816. https://doi.org/10.1139/w00-063
dc.relationAmiet-Charpentier, C., Gadille, P., Digat, B., & Benoit, J. P. (1998). Microencapsulation of rhizobacteria by spray-drying: Formulation and survival studies. Journal of Microencapsulation, 15(5), 639-659. https://doi.org/10.3109/02652049809008247
dc.relationBashan, Y. (1998). Inoculants of plant growth-promoting bacteria for use in agriculture. Biotechnology Advances, 16(4), 729-770. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0734-9750(98)00003-2
dc.relationashan, Y., de-Bashan, L. E., Prabhu, S. R., & Hernandez, J.-P. (2014). Advances in plant growth-promoting bacterial inoculant technology: Formulations and practical perspectives (1998-2013). Plant and Soil,378(1), 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-013-1956-x
dc.relationBashan, Y., & Levanony, H. (1987). Horizontal and vertical movement of Azospirillum brasilense Cd in the soil and along the rhizosphere of wheat and weeds in controlled and field environments. Journal of General Microbiology, 133(12), 3.473-3.480. https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-133-12-3473
dc.relationBashan, Y., Salazar, B., & Puente, M. E. (2009). Responses of native legume desert trees used for reforestation in the Sonoran Desert to plant growth-promoting microorganisms in screen house. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 45(6), 655-662. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-009-0368-9
dc.relationBashan, Y., Salazar, B., Puente, M. E., Bacilio, M., & Linderman, R. (2009). Enhanced establishment and growth of giant cardon cactus in an eroded field in the Sonoran Desert using native legume trees as nurse plants aided by plant growth-promoting microorganisms and compost. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 45(6), 585-594. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-009-0367-x
dc.relationBerg, G., Grube, M., Schloter, M., & Smalla, K. (2014). Unraveling the plant microbiome: Looking back and future perspectives. Frontiers in Microbiology, 5, artículo 148. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00148
dc.relationCalvo, P., Nelson, L., & Kloepper, J. W. (2014). Agricultural uses of plant biostimulants. Plant and Soil, 383(1-2), 3-41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-014-2131-8
dc.relationCampos, D. C., Acevedo, F., Morales, E., Aravena, J., Amiard, V., Jorquera, M. A., Inostroza, N. G., & Rubilar, M. (2014). Microencapsulation by spray drying of nitrogen-fixing bacteria associated with lupin nodules. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 30(9), 2.371-2.378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-014-1662-8
dc.relationCompant, S., Brader, G., Muzammil, S., Sessitsch, A., Lebrihi, A., & Mathieu, F. (2013). Use of beneficial bacteria and their secondary metabolites to control grapevine pathogen diseases. BioControl,58(4), 435-455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-012-9479-6
dc.relationDa Silva, M. F., de Souza Antônio, C., de Oliveira, P. J., Xavier, G. R., Rumjanek, N. G., de Barros Soares, L. H., & Reis, V. M. (2012). Survival of endophytic bacteria in polymer-based inoculants and efficiency of their application to sugarcane. Plant and Soil, 356(1), 231-243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-012-1242-3
dc.relationDe-Bashan, L. E., & Bashan, Y. (2010). Immobilized microalgae for removing pollutants: Review of practical aspects. Bioresource Technology, 101(6), 1.611-1.627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.09.043
dc.relationEiselt, P., Yeh, J., Latvala, R. K., Shea, L. D., & Mooney, D. J. (2000). Porous carriers for biomedical applications based on alginate hydrogels. Biomaterials, 21(19), 1.921-1.927. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00033-8
dc.relationGagné-Bourque, F., Xu, M., Dumont, M.-J., & Jabaji, S. (2015). Pea protein alginate encapsulated Bacillus subtilis B26, a plant biostimulant, provides controlled release and increased storage survival. Journal of Fertilizers & Pesticides, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.4172/jbfbp.1000157
dc.relationHerrmann, L., & Lesueur, D. (2013). Challenges of formulation and quality of biofertilizers for successful inoculation. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 97(20), 8.859-8.873. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-013-5228-8
dc.relationKang, Y., Shen, M., Wang, H., & Zhao, Q. (2013). A possible mechanism of action of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (pgpr) strain Bacillus pumilus WP8 via regulation of soil bacterial community structure. The Journal of General and Applied Microbiology, 59(4), 267-277. https://doi.org/10.2323/jgam.59.267
dc.relationKumaresan, G., & Reetha, D. (2011). Survival of Azospirillum brasilense in liquid formulation amended with different chemical additives. Journal of Phytology, 3(10), 48-51. http://updatepublishing.com/journal/index.php/jp/article/download/2725/2704
dc.relationLobo, C. B., Juárez Tomás, M. S., Viruel, E., Ferrero, M. A., & Lucca, M. E. (2019). Development of low-cost formulations of plant growth-promoting bacteria to be used as inoculants in beneficial agricultural technologies. Microbiological Research, 219, 12-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2018.10.012
dc.relationMurphy, J. F., Reddy, M. S., Ryu, C.-M., Kloepper, J. W., & Li, R. (2003). Rhizobacteria-mediated growth promotion of tomato leads to protection against cucumber mosaic virus. Phytopathology, 93(10), 1.301-1.307. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO.2003.93.10.1301
dc.relationOngena, M., Jourdan, E., Adam, A., Paquot, M., Brans, A., Joris, B., Arpigny, J.-L., & Thonart, P. (2007). Surfactin and fengycin lipopeptides of Bacillus subtilis as elicitors of induced systemic resistance in plants. Environmental Microbiology, 9(4), 1.084-1.090. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01202.x
dc.relationRekha, P. D., Lai, W.-A., Arun, A. B., & Young, C.-C. (2007). Effect of free and encapsulated Pseudomonas putida CC-FR2-4 and Bacillus subtilis CC-pg104 on plant growth under gnotobiotic conditions. Bioresource Technology, 98(2), 447-451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2006.01.009
dc.relationSchoebitz, M., Osman, J., & Ciampi, L. (2013). Effect of immobilized Serratia sp. by spray-drying technology on plant growth and phosphate uptake. Chilean Journal of Agricultural & Animal Sciences, 29(2), 111-119. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263235206_Effect_of_immobilized_Serratia_sp_By_spray-drying_technology_on_plant_growth_and_phosphate_uptake/link/53d2735c0cf228d363e94265/download
dc.relationSingleton, P., Keyser, H., & Sande, E. (2002). Development and evaluation of liquid inoculants. En D. Herridge (ed.), Inoculants and nitrogen fixation of legumes in Vietnam (pp. 52-66). aciar Proceedings.
dc.relationStephens, J. H. G., & Rask, H. M. (2000). Inoculant production and formulation. Field Crops Research, 65(2-3), 249-258. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(99)00090-8
dc.relationTarek, R., Dayal, T. R., Kaur, B. S., & Danielle, P. (2014). Development of efficient suspension formulation of starch industry wastewater grown Sinorhizobium meliloti for agricultural use. International Journal of Agriculture Innovations and Research, 3(4), 1.083-1.093. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/274961111_Development_of_Efficient_Suspension_Formulation_of_Starch_Industry_Wastewater_Grown_Sinorhizobium_Meliloti_for_Agricultural_Use/link/552d98760cf21acb0921786b/download
dc.relationTrejo, A., de-Bashan, L. E., Hartmann, A., Hernandez, J.-P., Rothballer, M., Schmid, M., & Bashan, Y. (2012). Recycling waste debris of immobilized microalgae and plant growth-promoting bacteria from wastewater treatment as a resource to improve fertility of eroded desert soil. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 75, 65-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2011.08.007
dc.relationTrivedi, P., Pandey, A., & Palni, L. M. S. (2005). Carrier-based preparations of plant growth-promoting bacterial inoculants suitable for use in cooler regions. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 21(6), 941-945. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-004-6820-y
dc.relationVassilev, N., Vassileva, M., Azcon, R., & Medina, A. (2001). Application of free and Ca-alginate-entrapped Glomus deserticola and Yarowia lipolytica in a soil–plant system. Journal of Biotechnology, 91(2-3), 237-242. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1656(01)00341-8
dc.relationWang, L., Khor, E., & Lim, L.-Y. (2001). Chitosan–alginate–CaCl2 system for membrane coat application. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 90(8), 1.134-1.142. https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.1067
dc.relationWu, Z., Guo, L., Zhao, Y., & Li, C. (2014). Effect of free and encapsulated Raoultella planticola Rs-2 on cotton growth promotion under salt stress. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 37(8), 1.187-1.201. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2014.881865
dc.relationXie, Z. P., Staehelin, C., Vierheilig, H., Wiemken, A., Jabbouri, S., Broughton, W. J., Vogeli-Lange, R., & Boller, T. (1995). Rhizobial nodulation factors stimulate mycorrhizal colonization of nodulating and nonnodulating soybeans. Plant Physiology, 108(4), 1.519-1.525. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.108.4.1519
dc.relationoung, C.-C., Rekha, P. D., Lai, W.-A., & Arun, A. B. (2006). Encapsulation of plant growth-promoting bacteria in alginate beads enriched with humic acid. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 95(1), 76-83. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.20957
dc.relationZohar-Perez, C., Chernin, L., Chet, I., & Nussinovitch, A. (2003). Structure of dried cellular alginate matrix containing fillers provides extra protection for microorganisms against uvc radiation. Radiation Research, 160(2), 198-204. https://doi.org/10.1667/rr3027
dc.relationZohar-Perez, C., Ritte, E., Chernin, L., Chet, I., & Nussinovitch, A. (2002). Preservation of chitinolytic Pantoae agglomerans in a viable form by cellular dried alginate-based carriers. Biotechnology Progress, 18(6), 1.133-1.140. https://doi.org/10.1021/bp025532t
dc.relation[Bacterias promotoras de crecimiento vegetal en sistemas de agricultura sostenible](http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12324/36976)
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectGenética vegetal y fitomejoramiento - F30
dc.subjectFisiología y bioquímica de la planta - F60
dc.subjectBiofertilizantes
dc.subjectGestión ambiental
dc.subjectTransversal
dc.subjecthttp://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24975
dc.subjecthttp://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_37875
dc.thumbnailhttps://repository.agrosavia.co/bitstreams/47d3015e-304d-4245-afd5-0089f5fe9f95/download
dc.thumbnailhttps://repository.agrosavia.co/bitstreams/ebca6a36-d154-4b0d-8edc-1d2cfea72bd5/download
dc.titleMétodos de aplicación de biofertilizantes bacterianos
dc.typeCapítulo

Archivos

Colecciones

Tecnológico