Effects of Cost and Campaign Advertising on Support for California’s Proposition 37

dc.creatorMcFadden, Brandon R.
dc.creatorLusk, Jayson L.
dc.date2017-04-01T20:17:10Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-09T07:29:46Z
dc.descriptionProposition 37 would have required genetically engineered food in California to be labeled. This paper reports the results of a survey designed to determine Californians’ voting intentions prior to the vote, perceptions about the prevalence of genetically engineered foods in the United States, willingness to pay for a mandatory label, and effectiveness of advocacy advertising. Overall, Californians had inaccurate knowledge about the prevalence of genetically engineered foods, and stated they were willing to pay up to 13.8% higher food costs on average for a mandatory label. Findings suggest that the effectiveness of opposition advertising was likely a formative factor in the defeat of Proposition 37.
dc.identifierdoi:10.22004/ag.econ.158284
dc.identifierhttps://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/158284/files/JARE_Aug2013__3_McFadden_p174.pdf
dc.identifierhttp://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/158284
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/588965
dc.languageeng
dc.publisher
dc.sourcehttp://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/158284
dc.titleEffects of Cost and Campaign Advertising on Support for California’s Proposition 37
dc.typeText

Archivos