Do institutions limit clientelism?: A study of the district assemblies common fund in Ghana

dc.creatorBanful, Afua Branoah
dc.date2009
dc.date2024-11-21T09:58:47Z
dc.date2024-11-21T09:58:47Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-27T15:07:11Z
dc.descriptionAnalyses of how coveted central-government resources in Africa are shared have shown widespread patronage, ethnic cronyism, and pork-barrel politics. While some governments have attempted to rectify the situation by establishing revenue-sharing formulas, a key unanswered question is whether such institutions are able to achieve this goal. This paper presents an empirical investigation of a pioneering formula-based system of resource allocation from the central government to local governments in Ghana?the District Assemblies Common Fund (DACF). The evidence is consistent with governments being able to politically manipulate resource allocation within the confines of the formula-based system. Nevertheless, this does not suggest that the DACF completely fails to limit political influence. It indicates that other guiding structures of a formula-based system?in particular, how and when the formula can be altered?are important determinants of how well a program such as the DACF is able to resist political pressures.
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/161849
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/95106
dc.languageen
dc.publisherInternational Food Policy Research Institute
dc.rightsOpen Access
dc.sourceBanful, Afua Branoah. 2009. Do institutions limit clientelism? IFPRI Discussion Paper 855. https://hdl.handle.net/10568/161849
dc.subjectresource allocation
dc.subjectgovernance
dc.titleDo institutions limit clientelism?: A study of the district assemblies common fund in Ghana
dc.typeWorking Paper

Archivos