Effect of rizobacterias inoculating nitrogen fixers in the cultivation of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas Lam.)

dc.audienceInvestigador
dc.creatorLorena Castellanosone, Lily Moon
dc.creatorSánchez lopez, Diana Beatriz
dc.creatorGarcía Peña, Joaquin Alfonso
dc.creatorEspitia Montes, Amaury Aroldo
dc.date2024-08-05T18:59:49Z
dc.date2024-08-05T18:59:49Z
dc.date2020-02-18
dc.date2020
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-27T04:42:23Z
dc.descriptionThe excessive use of nitrogen fertilizers in the nutrition of plants Generates environmental problems and Increases the production costs of crop. Plant Growth Promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) are an alternative to the use of chemical fertilizers, Favoring the yield of crops. The objective of esta investigation was to determine the effect of inoculation of rhizobacteria With fixed nitrogen sweet potato crop in the Montes de Maria microregion. Sweet potato cutting of the variety Tainung 66, provenance was established under a design of complete blocks at random With an Increased factorial arrangement 3x2+2, with three replications, Where the effect of native strains of Azotobacter sp. (IBCB10) and Azotobacter vinelandii was EVALUATED (IBCB15) mixed With fertilization levels (50% and 75%). The results Obtained Indicate That the inoculation of the IBCB10+IBCB15 bacteria in a mixture With 50% of the nitrogen fertilizer dose, Increased yields the crop by 57% Significantly With respect to the chemical and 93% Control T2 to T1 With relation (Without inoculation). Likewise, the application of the bacterium IBCB10 stimulated the production of dry matter greater tuberous roots of sweet potato, by optimizing the absorption of nitrogen fertilizer reduced to 50%. These results allow to rhizobacteria be included in management alternatives for the mineral nutrition of the sweet potato crop.
dc.descriptionBatata
dc.descriptionIpomoea batatas
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.identifierhttps://medcraveonline.com/HIJ/effect-of-rizobacterias-inoculating-nitrogen-fixers-in-the-cultivation-of-sweet-potato-ipomoea-batatas-lam.html
dc.identifier2576-4462
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12324/39788
dc.identifier10.15406/hij.2020.04.00153
dc.identifierreponame:Biblioteca Digital Agropecuaria de Colombia
dc.identifierinstname:Corporación colombiana de investigación agropecuaria AGROSAVIA
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/35993
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherMedCrave Publishing
dc.relationHorticulture International Journal
dc.relation4
dc.relation1
dc.relation35
dc.relation40
dc.relationCusumano C, Zamudio N. Technical Manual for growing yams (sweet potatoes or yams) in the province of Tucuman (Argentina). INTA editions, Santiago de Estero, ARG. 2013.
dc.relationSreekanth A. Orange fleshed sweet potatoes in food and livelihood security in India. Advance techniques in quality planting materials production and commercial cultivation of tropical tuber crops. editors. Nedunchezhiyan M. Regional center of central tuber Crops research institute, Bhubaneswar, Orissa, India, 2008;22–24.
dc.relationNedunchezhiyan M, Byju G, Dash SN. Effects of organic production of orange fleshed sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas L.) on root yield, quality and soil biological health. International Journal of Plant Science Research. 2010;1(6):136–143.
dc.relationCuéllar AE, Martinez LR, Espinosa RR, et al. Effect of nitrogen and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in two commercial clones of potato on soil Pardo carbonated soft. Agricultural center. 2015;42(2):39–46.
dc.relationMarquis JM, Da Silva TF, Vollu RE, et al. Plant age and Genotype Affect the bacterial community composition in the rhizosphere of Tuber field-grown sweet potato plants. FEMS Microbiology Ecolology. 2014;88(2):424–435.
dc.relationGiletto C, Monti MC, Ceroli P, et al. Effect of nitrogen fertilization on the quality of potato tubers (Var. Innovator) in Southeast Bonaerense. Revista Iberoamericana Postharvest Technology. 2013;14(2):217– 222.
dc.relationSingh NK, Chaudhary FK, Patel DB. Effectiveness of Azotobacter bio-inoculant for wheat grown under dryland condition. Journal of Environmental biology. 2013;34(5):927–932.
dc.relationDawwam GE, Elbeltagy A, Emara HM, et al. Effect of plant growth Beneficial bacteria isolated from the Promoting roots of potato plant. Annals of Agricultural Sciences. 2013;58(2):195–201.
dc.relationGhyselinck J, Velivelli SL, Heylen K, et al. Bioprospecting in potato fields in the Central Andean Highlands: screening of rhizobacteria for plant growth-promoting properties. Systematic and Applied Microbiology. 2013;36 (2):116–-127.
dc.relationSanchez LDB, Perez PJV, Hinestroza DHA. Effect of PGPB on growth Pennisetum kikuyu under stress. International Journal of Biotechnology. 2016;18(1):65–72.
dc.relationSouza RD, Ambrosini A, Passaglia LM. Plant growth-promoting bacteria as inoculants in agricultural soils. Genetics and molecular biology. 2015;38(4):401–419.
dc.relationZaidi A, Ahmad E, Khan MS, et al. Role of plant growth in sustainable production Promoting rhizobacteria of vegetables: current perspective. Scientia Horticulturae. 2017;193:231–239.
dc.relationSantoyo G, Moreno G, Carmen Orozco M, et al. Plant growthpromoting bacterial endophytes. Microbiological Research. 2016;183:92–99.
dc.relationSouza R, Beneduzi A, Ambrosini A, et al. The effect of plant growthpromoting rhizobacteria on the growth of rice (Oryza sativa L.) cropped fields in southern Brazilian. Plant and Soil. 2016;366(1- 2):585–603.
dc.relationSureshbabu K, Amaresan N, Kumar K. Multiple function amazing properties of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in the rhizosphere soil. International Journal of Applied Sciences and Current Microbiology. 2016;5(2):661–683.
dc.relationHabibi S, Djedidi S, Prongjunthuek K, et al. Physiological and genetic characterization of rice nitrogen fixer PGPR isolated from rhizosphere soils of different crops. Plant and Soil. 2014;379:51–66.
dc.relationRodriguez J, Rivers Y, Baro Y. Effectiveness of Azotobacter sp strains. and Bacillus sp. to control fungal species associated with vegetables. Tropical Crops. 2016;37(1):13–19.
dc.relationMatilla MA, Krell T. Rhizosphere bacteria as a source of antibiotics. Alliances and Trends. 2017;2(1):14–21.
dc.relationValenzuela JOS. Biochemical and molecular characterization of bacteria associated with legumes four nodes in the province of Santa Elena, Ecuador. Ergo-sum Science. 2018;25(1):1–10.
dc.relationHair R, Gamarra M, Ventocilla DG. Molecular characterization of Azospirillum sp., Azotobacter sp. and Pseudomonas sp. Plant growth promoters cultures of Solanum tuberosum and Zea mays. SAGASTEGUIANA. 2018;2(2):145–156.
dc.relationAhemad M, Kibret M. Mechanisms and applications of plant growth Promoting rhizobacteria: current perspective. King Saud University Journal of Science. 2014;26(1):1–20.
dc.relationMu ‘minah, Baharuddin, Hazarin S, et al. Isolation and screening of exopolysaccharide producing bacterial (EPS) from rhizosphere for Soil Potato Aggregation. International journal of Microbiology and current applied Sciences. 2015;4(6):341–349.
dc.relationMahmoud K, Makaju S, Ibrahim R, et al. Current progress in nitrogen fixing plants and microbiome research. Plants. 2020;9 (1):97.
dc.relationAbbasi MW, Zaki MJ, Anis M. Application of Bacillus species cultured on different low cost organic substrates for the Control of root-knot nematode infection on okra (okra Moench). Pakistan Journal Botany. 2013;45(3):1079–1084.
dc.relationSivasakthi S, Usharani G, Saranraj P. Biocontrol of plant growth potentiality Promoting bacteria (PGPR) - Pseudomonas fluorescens and Bacillus subtilis: A review. African Journal of Agricultural Research. 2014;9(16):1265–1277.
dc.relationPageni BB, Lupwayi NZ, Akter Z, et al. Plant growth-promoting and phytopathogen-antagonistic properties of bacterial endophytes from potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) cropping systems. Canadian Journal of Plant Science. 2014;94(5):835–844.
dc.relationGarrido MF, Cardenas DM, Bonilla RR, et al. Effect of edaphoclimatic factors and grass species diversity diazotrophic in bacteria. Pastures and fodder. 2010;33(4):1–1.
dc.relationIsfahani FM, Isfahani SM, Besharati H. Tarighaleslami, M. Yield and concentration of some macro and micro nutrients of cucumber as influenced by bio-fertilizers. Annals of Biological Research. 2013;4:61–67.
dc.relationGrobelak A, Napora A, Kacprzak M. Using growth-promoting rhizobacteria plant (PGPR) to improve increase plant growth. Ecological Engineering. 2015;84:22–28.
dc.relationSeymen M, ürkmen Ö, Dursun A, et al. Effects of bacteria inoculation on yield, yield components and mineral contents of tomato. Selçuk Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences. 2015;28(2):52–57.
dc.relationPerez PJV, Sanchez LDB. Characterization and effect of azotobacter, azospirillum and pseudomonas associated Ipomoea batatas of the Colombian Caribbean. International Journal of Biotechnology. 2017;19(2):39–50.
dc.relationDöbereiner J, Baldani VLD, Baldani JI. As isolar and identify bacteria diazotrophic leguminous plants Nao. Brasília: EMBRAPA-SPI. Itaguaí, RJ: EMBRAPA-CNPAB. 1995;11–60.
dc.relationBertani G. Studies on lysogenesis. I. The mode of liberation by lysogenic phage Escherichia coli. Journal of Bacteriololy. 1951;62:293–300.
dc.relationMahato S, Kafle A. Comparative study of azotobacter with or without other fertilizers on growth and yield of wheat in Western hills of Nepal. Annals of Agrarian Science. 2018;16(3):250–256.
dc.relationMarquis JM, Da Silva TF, Vollú, RE, et al. Bacterial endophytes of sweet potato tuberous roots AFFECTED by the plant genotype and growth stage. Applied Soil Ecology. 2015;96(1):273–281.
dc.relationArcos J, Zuniga D. Promoting rhizobacteria plant growth with capacity to improve productivity in potato. Revista Latinoamericana de la Papa. 2016;20(1):18–31.
dc.relationMartinez VR, Lopez M, Dibut A, et al. Biological fixing atmospheric nitrogen in tropical conditions. Venezuela MPPAT. 2007.
dc.relationRivera D, Obando M, Bonilla R. Standardization of culture medium from agroindustrial sources for multiplying Azospirillum brasilense. Responses Journal. 2012;17(2):31–38.
dc.relationFarzana Y, Radizah O. Influence of rhizobacterial inoculation on growth of the sweet potato cultivar. On Line Journal of Biological Science. 2005;1(3):176–179.
dc.relationYasmin F, Othman R, Sijam K, et al. Effect of PGPR inoculation on growth and yield of sweet potato. Journal Biological Sciences. 2007;7(2):421–424.
dc.relationTuran M, Gulluce M, Şahin F. Effects of plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria on yield, growth, and some Physiological Characteristics of wheat and barley plants. Communications in Soil Science and Plant analysis. 2012;43(12):1658–1673.
dc.relationRuisánchez Y, Hernandez MI, Rodriguez J. Evaluation of dimabac and fitomas E bioproducts in growing tomato. Magazine agricultural issues. 2013;18(1):49–56.
dc.relationBal HB, Nayak L, Das S, et al. Isolation of ACC deaminase producing PGPR from rice rhizosphere and Evaluating Their plant growth activity under salt stress Promoting. Plant and Soil. 2013;366(1-2):93–105.
dc.relationBakhshandeh E, Gholamhosseini M, Yaghoubian Y, et al. Plant growth Promoting microorganisms can improve increase germination, seedling growth and potassium uptake of soybean under drought and salt stress. Plant Growth Regulation. 2020;90(1):123–136.
dc.relationNasution RA, Tangapo AM, Taufik I, et al. Comparison of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) diversity and dynamics During growth of Cilembu Sweet Potato (Ipomoea batatas L var. Rancing) in Cilembu and Jatinangor Site, Indonesia. Journal of Pure and Applied Microbiology. 2017;11(2):837–846.
dc.relationAsghari B, Khademian R, Sedaghati B. Plant growth Promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) confer drought resistance and biosynthesis of secondary metabolites Stimulate in pennyroyal (pennyroyal L.) under water shortage condition. Scientia Horticulturae. 2020;263(2020):109–132.
dc.relationSingh AB, Deo C, Kumar S, et al. Growth and yield response of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas L.) cv. NDSP-65 to integrated different organic sources. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry. 2017;6(6):738–741.
dc.relationRoman N, Mamani G, Garcia D. Molecular characterization of bacteria Azospirillum, Azotobacter sp and Pseudomonas sp. plant growth promoters cultures of Solanum tuberosum and Zea mays. Prospective University. 2013;10(1):89–97.
dc.relationKader MA, Mian MH, Hoque MS. Effects of Azotobacter inoculant on the yield and nitrogen uptake by wheat. Journal Biological Sciences. 2002;2(4):259–261.
dc.relationSanchez JM, Ayala L, Yatziri I, et al. Response of maize (Zea mays L) to inoculation with Azotobacter sp and Burkholderia sp reduced dose of nitrogen fertilizer. Scientia Agriculture. 2014;5(1):17–23.
dc.relationMoon R, Espinosa K, Trávez R, et al. Response varieties of potato (Solanum tuberorum, L) to the application of organic fertilizers and chemical fertilizers. Science and Technology. 2016;9(1):11–16.
dc.relationGiletto CM, Rattín J, Echeverria HE, et al. Nitrogen requirement to achieve maximum performance and quality industrial potato varieties. Journal of the Faculty of Agricultural Sciences. National University of Cuyo. 2011;43(1):85–95.
dc.relationCoraspe HM, Muraoka T, Franzini VI, et al. Absorption of macronutrients potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) production of seed tubers. Interscience. 2009;34(1):57–63.
dc.relationEcheverria E, Garcia FO. Soil fertility and crop fertilization. No. 631.8. INTA. 2005.
dc.relationGlick BR. Bacterium with ACC deaminase Promote plant growth and can help to feed the world. Microbiological research. 2014;169(1):30– 39.
dc.relationSingh UN. Effect of bio-fertilizers on yield and economic traits of potato at two fertility levels. HortFlora Spectrum Research. 2013;2(3):262–264.
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
dc.sourceHorticulture International Journal; Vol. 4, Núm. 1 (2020): Horticulture International Journal (Febr.);p 35-40.
dc.subjectCultivo - F01
dc.subjectIpomoea batatas
dc.subjectCultivo
dc.subjectInoculación
dc.subjectRizobacteria
dc.subjectRaíces y tubérculos
dc.subjecthttp://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3937
dc.subjecthttp://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1972
dc.subjecthttp://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3879
dc.subjecthttp://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_25068
dc.thumbnailhttps://repository.agrosavia.co/bitstreams/cc9c89c6-6f76-463d-b1e8-e51dde72f476/download
dc.titleEffect of rizobacterias inoculating nitrogen fixers in the cultivation of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas Lam.)
dc.titleEffect of rizobacterias inoculating nitrogen fixers in the cultivation of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas Lam.)
dc.typeArtículo científico

Archivos

Colecciones