Landowner response to policies regulating land improvements: lease or search for other options?
No hay miniatura disponible
Fecha
Autores
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Resumen
Descripción
Land improvements with long pay-back periods are often delayed on leased agricultural land,
resulting in social costs through land degradation, decreased land productivity and environmental
problems. An important question is thus how landowners would respond to regulations and
mandates concerning land improvements. Based on a landowner survey, we analyse landowner
choices under certain land improvement regulations, using the currently dominant choice of
leasing land for agricultural use as the benchmark. The results indicated that land leasing will
continue to increase in the future, but if the landowner mandate to co-finance costly land
improvements is increased, landowners are predicted to respond significantly to these mandates
and search for other land management options. Three heterogeneous landowner groups were
identified based on their land use choices. Current leasers and amenity owners, in particular, were
sensitive to land improvement mandates, and would avoid compulsory investment expenses by
selling or afforesting their land.