Responding to the challenges of impact assessment of participatory research and gender analysis
| dc.creator | Lilja, Nina | |
| dc.creator | Dixon, John A. | |
| dc.date | 2008-01 | |
| dc.date | 2014-10-02T08:33:09Z | |
| dc.date | 2014-10-02T08:33:09Z | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-06-27T14:34:26Z | |
| dc.description | Since the Green Revolution, the public-sector's agricultural research strategy for increasing food crop productivity has been explicitly based on the premise that technology can cross political and agro-climatic boundaries, primarily through the training and visit system of extension (also known as transfer of technology and the pipeline model). Today, a different strategy is emerging. Efforts to develop the necessary institutional capacity for more client-oriented participatory research, particularly in plant breeding, are now a central part of the public-sector agricultural research strategy. Greater use of participatory and gender-analysis approaches in agricultural research has significant conceptual and methodological implications for impact assessment and institutional learning. | |
| dc.identifier | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/44046 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/82097 | |
| dc.language | en | |
| dc.publisher | Cambridge University Press | |
| dc.rights | Limited Access | |
| dc.source | Lilja, Nina; Dixon, John. 2008. Responding to the challenges of impact assessment of participatory research and gender analysis. Experimental Agriculture 44, 3-19. | |
| dc.subject | gender | |
| dc.subject | agricultural research | |
| dc.subject | impact assessment | |
| dc.subject | farmer participation | |
| dc.subject | gender analysis | |
| dc.subject | investigación agraria | |
| dc.subject | evaluación del impacto | |
| dc.subject | participación de agricultores | |
| dc.subject | análisis de género | |
| dc.title | Responding to the challenges of impact assessment of participatory research and gender analysis | |
| dc.type | Journal Article |
