Nigerians in poverty consume little wheat and wheat self-sufficiency programmes will not protect them from price shocks related to the Russia–Ukraine conflict

dc.creatorLiverpool-Tasie, Saweda Lenis Onipede
dc.creatorReardon, Thomas
dc.creatorParkhi, C.M.
dc.creatorDolislager, M.
dc.date2023
dc.date2023-09-05T10:17:25Z
dc.date2023-09-05T10:17:25Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-27T15:44:39Z
dc.descriptionThe Russia–Ukraine conflict has prompted calls for resource diversification and wheat self-sufficiency programmes in import-dependent regions. Here we show that this approach would have minimal impact on poor Nigerians as wheat constitutes only 4% of their total food consumption and 8% of their starchy staple consumption. In contrast, millets, rice, cassava and tubers are ten times more important—highlighting the need for careful consideration of country-context consumption patterns in response to external food system shocks.
dc.identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/131745
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/113383
dc.languageen
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.rightsLimited Access
dc.sourceLiverpool-Tasie, L.S.O., Reardon, T., Parkhi, C.M. & Dolislager, M. (2023). Nigerians in poverty consume little wheat and wheat self-sufficiency programmes will not protect them from price shocks related to the Russia–Ukraine conflict. Nature Food, 4(4), 288-293.
dc.subjectfood security
dc.subjectdevelopment economics
dc.subjectwheat
dc.subjectfood consumption
dc.subjectpoverty alleviation
dc.subjectnigeria
dc.titleNigerians in poverty consume little wheat and wheat self-sufficiency programmes will not protect them from price shocks related to the Russia–Ukraine conflict
dc.typeJournal Article

Archivos