Can concessions be justified?: a multidisciplinary perspective from Africa and beyond

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.creatorSinger, B.
dc.creatorKarsenty, A.
dc.date2008-11-10
dc.date2012-06-04T09:13:06Z
dc.date2012-06-04T09:13:06Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-27T14:01:21Z
dc.descriptionForest concessions are currently in a state of flux. Despite mitigated results in some regions, they are still hailed as the path to sustainable forest management on other continents. Using geographical, economic, and political viewpoints, this article offers a multidisciplinary perspective to account for this apparent contradiction. The authors conclude that although political actors continue to support or criticize them by using a range of historical, contextual, and ideological associations, large-scale forest concessions can be theoretically justified from an economic and geographical viewpoint
dc.identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/20161
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/71447
dc.languageen
dc.publisherInforma UK Limited
dc.sourceSinger, B., Karsenty, A. 2008. Can concessions be justified?: a multidisciplinary perspective from Africa and beyond . Journal of Sustainable Forestry 3 (27) :224-245 doi: 10.1080/10549810802256205. ISSN: 1054-9811.
dc.subjectconcession (land)
dc.subjectforest management
dc.subjectsustainability
dc.subjectfood science
dc.subjectforestry
dc.titleCan concessions be justified?: a multidisciplinary perspective from Africa and beyond
dc.typeJournal Article

Archivos

Colecciones

Centro para la Investigación Forestal Internacional (CIFOR)